{
  "id": 8202254,
  "name": "IN RE: M.C., A Minor Juvenile",
  "name_abbreviation": "In re M.C.",
  "decision_date": "2007-05-01",
  "docket_number": "No. COA06-886",
  "first_page": "152",
  "last_page": "153",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "183 N.C. App. 152"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C. Ct. App.",
    "id": 14983,
    "name": "North Carolina Court of Appeals"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "229 S.E.2d 179",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "weight": 2,
      "year": 1976,
      "pin_cites": [
        {
          "page": "181"
        }
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "291 N.C. 137",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8557412
      ],
      "year": 1976,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/291/0137-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 191,
    "char_count": 2925,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.758,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 3.0702420682741277e-07,
      "percentile": 0.8572723737947656
    },
    "sha256": "902877358496fdf5b2e421f0be9dc34f6da8baaba2ffd92f8c7c1be442273ff8",
    "simhash": "1:ccd8d60ef71b8bd7",
    "word_count": 466
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:07:58.512650+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [
      "Judges STEELMAN and LEVINSON concur."
    ],
    "parties": [
      "IN RE: M.C., A Minor Juvenile"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "McCullough, Judge.\nRespondent M.C. appeals from adjudication and disposition orders finding him delinquent for misdemeanor larceny. On appeal, respondent raises two assignments of error. However, the disposi-tive issue is whether the trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to enter the adjudication and disposition orders due to the untimely filing of the juvenile petition. In its brief, the State concedes that the petition was not timely filed and the trial court\u2019s orders must be vacated.\nAs an initial matter, we note that respondent did not raise this issue before the trial court. Nevertheless,' questions regarding whether the trial court had subject matter jurisdiction over the case may be raised for the first time on appeal and, therefore, the issue is properly before us. See State v. Beaver, 291 N.C. 137, .139-40, 229 S.E.2d 179, 181 (1976).\nPursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. \u00a7 7B-1703(b), a juvenile petition must be filed \u201cwithin 15 days after the complaint is received\u201d by the juvenile court counselor. N.C. Gen. Stat. \u00a7 7B-1703(b) (2005). The statute also provides that an extension of an additional fifteen days may be granted at the discretion of the chief court counselor. Id. Consequently, the juvenile petition must be filed within a maximum of thirty days after the complaint is received by the juvenile court counselor.\nHere, the only indication of when the juvenile court counselor received the complaint is the date that the petition was verified by a Wilmington Police Department detective: 1 November 2005. The petition was filed with the trial court on 2 December 2005. The time period from 1 November 2005 to 2 December 2005 is more than thirty days. As the petition was filed outside the statutory maximum time of thirty days in accordance with N.C. Gen. Stat. \u00a7 7B-1703(b), we conclude the trial court erred by asserting jurisdiction over M.C. Accordingly, the adjudication and disposition orders of the trial court must be vacated and this case remanded to the New Hanover County District Court for entry of an order dismissing the action.\nVacated and remanded.\nJudges STEELMAN and LEVINSON concur.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "McCullough, Judge."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Attorney General Roy Cooper, by Special Deputy Attorney General Mabel Y Bullock, for the State.",
      "Peter Wood for respondent appellant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "IN RE: M.C., A Minor Juvenile\nNo. COA06-886\n(Filed 1 May 2007)\nJuveniles\u2014 jurisdiction \u2014 timing of petition filing \u2014 subject matter jurisdiction\nJuvenile adjudication and disposition orders finding respondent delinquent for misdemeanor larceny were vacated where the trial court erred by asserting jurisdiction when the petition was filed outside the statutory maximum of thirty days after the complaint was received by the juvenile court counselor. N.C.G.S. \u00a7 7B-1703(b).\nAppeal by respondent juvenile, M.C., from orders entered 17 March 2006 by Judge J.H. Corpening, II, in New Hanover County District Court. Heard in the Court of Appeals 16 April 2007.\nAttorney General Roy Cooper, by Special Deputy Attorney General Mabel Y Bullock, for the State.\nPeter Wood for respondent appellant."
  },
  "file_name": "0152-01",
  "first_page_order": 184,
  "last_page_order": 185
}