{
  "id": 8550663,
  "name": "JOSEPH BURROUGHS T/A QUALITY HEATING AND AIR CONDITIONING v. TARHEEL HOMES & REALTY, INC., UNIVERSITY TOWNHOUSES AND M. K. BRANCH",
  "name_abbreviation": "Burroughs v. Tarheel Homes & Realty, Inc.",
  "decision_date": "1973-07-25",
  "docket_number": "No. 733DC495",
  "first_page": "107",
  "last_page": "109",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "19 N.C. App. 107"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C. Ct. App.",
    "id": 14983,
    "name": "North Carolina Court of Appeals"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "181 S.E. 2d 602",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "278 N.C. 702",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8561658,
        8561635,
        8561581,
        8561606
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/278/0702-04",
        "/nc/278/0702-03",
        "/nc/278/0702-01",
        "/nc/278/0702-02"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "180 S.E. 2d 402",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "year": 1971,
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "11 N.C. App. 152",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        8553321
      ],
      "year": 1971,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc-app/11/0152-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "163 S.E. 2d 363",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "year": 1968,
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "274 N.C. 362",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8560125
      ],
      "year": 1968,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/274/0362-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 219,
    "char_count": 2846,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.494,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.20590100040581516
    },
    "sha256": "2724c395772c40b97cf5f129161a35a5e5b41cb5061e4d95ba275580b06c9cf6",
    "simhash": "1:2a4994e73a1e5cf0",
    "word_count": 460
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:32:34.966448+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [
      "Judges Campbell and Baley concur."
    ],
    "parties": [
      "JOSEPH BURROUGHS T/A QUALITY HEATING AND AIR CONDITIONING v. TARHEEL HOMES & REALTY, INC., UNIVERSITY TOWNHOUSES AND M. K. BRANCH"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "BRITT, Judge.\nThe sole purported assignment of error brought forward and. argued in appellant\u2019s brief is that the court erred \u201cin finding that the plaintiff should recover a sum of money from University Townhouses, Inc.\u201d\nThe record on appeal discloses no exceptions by appellant to the \u201cproceedings,, ruling, or judgment, of the court\u201d as required'by .Rul\u00e9s 19(c) and 2\u00cd of the Rules of .Practice in the Court of Appeals.' Inasmuch as there is no exception to any finding of fact, we assume that \u201cimplied\u201d exception is to the signing and entry of the judgment.. . .\nIn Fishing Pier v. Carolina Beach, 274 N.C. 362, 163 S.E. 2d 363 (1968), our Supreme Court, speaking through Chief Justice Parker, said:\"\n\u201cThis sole assignment of error to the signing of the judgment presents the face of the record proper for review, but review is limited to the question of wh\u00e9ther error of law appears on the face of the record, which includes whether the facts found or admitted support the judgment, and whether the judgment is regular in form.\u201d\nSee also Morris v. Perkins, 11 N.C. App. 152, 180 S.E. 2d 402 (1971); cert. den., 278 N.C. 702, 181 S.E. 2d 602.\nIn the instant case we hold th.at the facts found by the trial court, or admitted, support the judgment, that .the judgment is regular in form, and that error does not appear on the face of the record.\nThe judgment appealed from is\nAffirmed.\nJudges Campbell and Baley concur.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "BRITT, Judge."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Laurence S. Graham for plaintiff appellee.",
      "Gaylord and Singleton by A. Louis Singleton for defendant appellant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "JOSEPH BURROUGHS T/A QUALITY HEATING AND AIR CONDITIONING v. TARHEEL HOMES & REALTY, INC., UNIVERSITY TOWNHOUSES AND M. K. BRANCH\nNo. 733DC495\n(Filed 25 July 1973)\nAppeal and Error \u00a7 26\u2014 implied exception to signing and entry of judgment\nWhere defendant made no exception to any finding of fact, the court on appeal assumes an implied exception to the signing and entry of the judgment.\nAppeal by defendant University Townhouses, Inc., from Whedbee, Judge, at the 5 March 1973 Session of District Court held in PlTT County.\nPlaintiff instituted this action against the three defendants named in the caption to recover $1,401.87 (plus interest and costs) for installation of duct work in connection with, and repair services performed on, certain heating and air conditioning equipment belonging to defendant University Townhouses, Inc. (Townhouses). Defendants filed answers denying any indebtedness to plaintiff and defendant Townhouses asserted a counterclaim and setoff for $2,000.\nJury trial was waived. After hearing evidence presented by all parties, the court, entered an order dismissing the action as to. defendants Tarheel Homes & Realty, Inc., and Branch, and entered judgment finding facts and adjudging that plaintiff recover $700 and costs from defendant Townhouses.\nDefendant Townhouses appealed.\nLaurence S. Graham for plaintiff appellee.\nGaylord and Singleton by A. Louis Singleton for defendant appellant."
  },
  "file_name": "0107-01",
  "first_page_order": 131,
  "last_page_order": 133
}