{
  "id": 8554345,
  "name": "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. WINFRED EUGENE SCOTT",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Scott",
  "decision_date": "1973-09-19",
  "docket_number": "No. 7319SC557",
  "first_page": "461",
  "last_page": "461",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "19 N.C. App. 461"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C. Ct. App.",
    "id": 14983,
    "name": "North Carolina Court of Appeals"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 121,
    "char_count": 1089,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.527,
    "sha256": "baed92243ff9a471d9f09a59a2c506103e415e219eef42ba1a5d2bddf0e86cdd",
    "simhash": "1:5729a17005ba2283",
    "word_count": 174
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:32:34.966448+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [
      "Judges Morris and Parker concur."
    ],
    "parties": [
      "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. WINFRED EUGENE SCOTT"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "BROCK, Chief Judge.\nWith considerable tenacity, defendant has brought forward seventeen exceptions grouped in five assignments of error. We have carefully considered each and find that they present no new or novel question. We feel, therefore, that a seriatim discussion would serve no useful purpose.\nIn our opinion defendant had a fair trial, free from prejudicial error.\nNo error.\nJudges Morris and Parker concur.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "BROCK, Chief Judge."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Attorney. General Morgan, by Assistant Attorney General Ray, for the State.",
      "Ottway Burton for the defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. WINFRED EUGENE SCOTT\nNo. 7319SC557\n(Filed 19 September 1973)\nAppeal by defendant from Seay, Judge, 5 March 1973 Session of Superior Court held in Randolph County.\nDefendant was charged with operating a motor vehicle upon the public highways while under .the influence of intoxicating liquor in violation of G.S. 20-138. He was tried and found guilty in the District Court. \u00dcpon his appeal he was tried de novo in the Superior Court and again found guilty. An active sentence of six months was imposed. Defendant appealed to this Court.\nAttorney. General Morgan, by Assistant Attorney General Ray, for the State.\nOttway Burton for the defendant."
  },
  "file_name": "0461-01",
  "first_page_order": 485,
  "last_page_order": 485
}