{
  "id": 8555518,
  "name": "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. LONNIE BRYANT",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Bryant",
  "decision_date": "1973-10-24",
  "docket_number": "No. 7311SC696",
  "first_page": "676",
  "last_page": "677",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "19 N.C. App. 676"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C. Ct. App.",
    "id": 14983,
    "name": "North Carolina Court of Appeals"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 210,
    "char_count": 3634,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.565,
    "sha256": "cc542605ed974359efc1424ae7425960769a3e60ea1ba2d04827a204b2240cc6",
    "simhash": "1:549dc1ce443c47b5",
    "word_count": 594
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:32:34.966448+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [
      "Judges Britt and Parker concur."
    ],
    "parties": [
      "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. LONNIE BRYANT"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "VAUGHN, Judge.\nNo assignments of error are brought forward in connection with cases 73CR3034 and 73CR3033. We have examined the record in these cases and find no prejudicial error.\nAll of the assignments of error as to 73CR3039, the case involving the assault on Currie, relate to the fact that, under instructions of the Court, the jury was allowed to consider verdicts of assault with a deadly weapon with intent to kill resulting in serious injury, the felony punishable under G.S. 14-32(a), and assault with a deadly weapon inflicting serious injury, the felony punishable under G.S. 14-32 (b), when, in fact, he was indicted for assault with a firearm with intent to kill, the felony punishable under G.S. 14-32 (c).\nDefendant\u2019s exception is well-taken. The indictment for assault with a firearm with intent to kill (G.S. 14-32 (c)) would not support a verdict of guilty of assault with a deadly weapon with intent to kill inflicting serious injury (G.S. 14-32(a)) and does not support the verdict of guilty of assault with a deadly weapon inflicting serious injury (G.S. 14-32 (b)).\nIt is apparent from reading the charge that the judge was under the mistaken impression that defendant was charged with identical offenses under G.S. 14-32 (a) on Rawlings and Currie. As to Currie, however, defendant was only charged with assault with a firearm with intent to kill. (G.S. 14-32 (c)).\nIn 73CR3034 \u2014 No error.\nIn 73CR3033 \u2014 No error.\nIn 73CR3039 \u2014 New trial.\nJudges Britt and Parker concur.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "VAUGHN, Judge."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Attorney General Robert Morgan by Miss Ann Reed, Associate Attorney for the State.",
      "Wallace Ashley, Jr., for defendant appellant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. LONNIE BRYANT\nNo. 7311SC696\n(Filed 24 October 1973)\nAssault and Battery \u00a7\u00a7 11, 16 \u2014 assault with firearm with intent to kill \u2014 indictment \u2014 submission of other types of felonious assault\nAn indictment for assault with a firearm with intent to kill under G.S. 14-32 (c) will not support a verdict of guilty of assault with a deadly weapon with intent to kill inflicting serious injury under G.S. 14-32(a) or a verdict of guilty of assault with a deadly weapon inflicting serious injury under G.S. 14-32 (b).\n\u25a0 Appeal by defendant from Canadaty, Judge, 7 May 1973 Session of Superior Court held in Johnston County.\nDefendant was arraigned on separate bills of indictment charging that he did:\n1. Murder Molton Ray Rawlings (73CR3034).\n2. Assault James Rawlings with a deadly weapon with intent to kill inflicting serious injuries (73CR3033).\n3. Assault Sam Currie with a firearm with intent to kill ( 73CR3039).\nThe offenses occurred around 5:00 a.m. bn the morning of 17 March 1973 at a place called Bradley\u2019s Amusement Center in Princeton after an argument about a poker game.\nThe cases were consolidated for trial without objection from defendant. In the murder case the solicitor announced that he would seek a verdict of guilty of murder in the second. degree or manslaughter. The State and defendant offered evidence. Defendant did not deny the shootings but contended that he acted in self-defense.\nThe verdicts and judgments were as follows:\n1. (73CR3034) Guilty of voluntary manslaughter of Molton Ray Rawlings: Imprisonment for 15-20 years.\n2. (73CR3033) Guilty of assault with a deadly weapon inflicting serious-in jury on James Rawlings: Imprisonment for 3-5 years to follow the term imposed in 73CR3034.\n3. (73CR3039) Guilty of assault with a deadly weapon inflicting serious injury on Sam Currie: Imprisonment for 3-5 years to follow the term imposed in 73CR3033.\nDefendant gave notice- of appeal in each case. His trial counsel was appointed to represent him on appeal.\nAttorney General Robert Morgan by Miss Ann Reed, Associate Attorney for the State.\nWallace Ashley, Jr., for defendant appellant."
  },
  "file_name": "0676-01",
  "first_page_order": 700,
  "last_page_order": 701
}