{
  "id": 8554423,
  "name": "FRED ALEXANDER THOMPSON v. JAMES ALEX BOLES and ALITA REE BOLES",
  "name_abbreviation": "Thompson v. Boles",
  "decision_date": "1974-03-06",
  "docket_number": "No. 7421SC164",
  "first_page": "97",
  "last_page": "97",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "21 N.C. App. 97"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C. Ct. App.",
    "id": 14983,
    "name": "North Carolina Court of Appeals"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 108,
    "char_count": 1197,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.613,
    "sha256": "b1b03056b7a3971269a1480fe95d88152b8cc3b297954825ad8b383142135cf5",
    "simhash": "1:e9e732a8ec2bddff",
    "word_count": 183
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:32:29.924632+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [
      "Judges Britt and Vaughn concur."
    ],
    "parties": [
      "FRED ALEXANDER THOMPSON v. JAMES ALEX BOLES and ALITA REE BOLES"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "PARKER, Judge.\nPlaintiff was the only witness to testify concerning the collision. From his testimony it is impossible to determine what occurred. Even resolving all discrepancies in his favor and giving him the benefit of all favorable inferences, his testimony was insufficient to permit a jury to find that the collision occurred from any negligence on the part of defendants.\nAffirmed.\nJudges Britt and Vaughn concur.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "PARKER, Judge."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Richard Tyndall and Walter W. Pitt, Jr. for plaintiff appellant.",
      "W. F. Maready for defendant appellees."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "FRED ALEXANDER THOMPSON v. JAMES ALEX BOLES and ALITA REE BOLES\nNo. 7421SC164\n(Filed 6 March 1974)\nAutomobiles \u00a7 50\u2014 insufficiency of evidence of negligence\nPlaintiff\u2019s evidence was insufficient to permit a jury to find that the collision between his motorcycle and defendants\u2019 car occurred from any negligence on the part of defendants.\nAppeal by plaintiff from Armstrong, Judge, 15 October 1973 Session of Superior Court held in Forsyth County.\nAction for damages arising from a collision between plaintiff\u2019s motorcycle and defendants\u2019 automobile. At the close of plaintiff\u2019s evidence the court allowed defendants\u2019 motion for a directed verdict and plaintiff appealed.\nRichard Tyndall and Walter W. Pitt, Jr. for plaintiff appellant.\nW. F. Maready for defendant appellees."
  },
  "file_name": "0097-01",
  "first_page_order": 125,
  "last_page_order": 125
}