{
  "id": 8556478,
  "name": "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. LEROY PIERCE",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Pierce",
  "decision_date": "1974-05-01",
  "docket_number": "No. 744SC146",
  "first_page": "451",
  "last_page": "452",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "21 N.C. App. 451"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C. Ct. App.",
    "id": 14983,
    "name": "North Carolina Court of Appeals"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 146,
    "char_count": 1585,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.554,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 2.0446031217563963e-07,
      "percentile": 0.7531298156765124
    },
    "sha256": "652b02420df81b969998e53f65fb96d53082237b2f5bdf1d10b46c59ea13db1f",
    "simhash": "1:242e85ea9fea22f9",
    "word_count": 252
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:32:29.924632+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [
      "Judges Parker and Baley concur."
    ],
    "parties": [
      "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. LEROY PIERCE"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "BROCK, Chief Judge.\nDefendant\u2019s counsel states that he is unable to find arguable prejudicial error, but requests this Court to review the record for possible prejudicial error.\nWe have fully reviewed the record of defendant\u2019s trial, and defendant\u2019s supplemental argument. In our opinion, defendant had a fair trial, free from prejudicial error.\nNo error.\nJudges Parker and Baley concur.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "BROCK, Chief Judge."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Attorney General Morgan, by Assistant Attorney General Rich, for the State.",
      "William J. Morgan for the defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. LEROY PIERCE\nNo. 744SC146\n(Filed 1 May 1974)\nAppeal by defendant from Tillery, Judge, 10 September 1973 Session of Superior Court held in Onslow County. Argued in the Court of Appeals 16 April 1974.\nDefendant was tried upon a bill of indictment charging him with assault with intent to rape.\nThe State\u2019s evidence tended to show that on 13 July 1973, defendant ordered the prosecuting witness, defendant\u2019s thirteen-year-old daughter, to disrobe in his presence; that defendant attempted to have intercourse with the prosecuting witness who resisted; that defendant slapped the prosecuting witness; and that the prosecuting witness fled when the mother returned to the home.\nDefendant testified in his own behalf that he had consumed two beers that evening, but was not intoxicated; that defendant and his wife had been having marital difficulties; and that he did not assault the prosecuting witness, force her to disrobe, or get into bed with her.\nFrom a sentence of not less than twelve years nor more than fifteen years, defendant appealed to this Court.\nAttorney General Morgan, by Assistant Attorney General Rich, for the State.\nWilliam J. Morgan for the defendant."
  },
  "file_name": "0451-01",
  "first_page_order": 479,
  "last_page_order": 480
}