{
  "id": 11299541,
  "name": "DR. W. R. HARTNESS v. RONALD T. PENNY, Administrator of the Estate of A. C. HARRIS, Deceased",
  "name_abbreviation": "Hartness v. Penny",
  "decision_date": "1974-06-05",
  "docket_number": "No. 7411DC352",
  "first_page": "75",
  "last_page": "76",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "22 N.C. App. 75"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C. Ct. App.",
    "id": 14983,
    "name": "North Carolina Court of Appeals"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 192,
    "char_count": 3017,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.601,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 6.087085966315723e-08,
      "percentile": 0.38007833661344737
    },
    "sha256": "7107341b121385444791750e1117ee74accc7e9c4f3182222e40d8ffa834bdd3",
    "simhash": "1:5bc25c844ed0b098",
    "word_count": 521
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:09:41.671000+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [
      "Judges Parker and Carson concur."
    ],
    "parties": [
      "DR. W. R. HARTNESS v. RONALD T. PENNY, Administrator of the Estate of A. C. HARRIS, Deceased"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "VAUGHN, Judge.\nIt was error to grant plaintiff\u2019s motion for summary judgment.\nPlaintiff\u2019s theory is that the mailing of the account to defendant converted the account from an open account to an account stated. At this stage of the proceeding, this contention must fail for there is no showing when the account was mailed. It could have been mailed the day before Harris died. For that reason, there can be no presumption that Harris examined the account and accepted it as correct. We also note that the mere \u00e9ntry showing a payment by Medicare on 6 May 1972, would not, standing alone and as a matter of law, constitute a payment by the debtor which would toll the statute of limitations.\nThe judgment granting plaintiff\u2019s motion is reversed, and the case is remanded.\nReversed and remanded.\nJudges Parker and Carson concur.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "VAUGHN, Judge."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "W. W. Seymour by H. Clinton Cheshire for plaintiff ap-pellee.",
      "Ronald T. Penny for defendant appellant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "DR. W. R. HARTNESS v. RONALD T. PENNY, Administrator of the Estate of A. C. HARRIS, Deceased\nNo. 7411DC352\n(Filed 5 June 1974)\nAccounts \u00a7 1\u2014 action on account \u2014 statute of limitations \u2014 mailing of account \u2014 account stated \u2014 payment by Medicare\nIn a physician\u2019s action on an account in which defendant pled the statute of limitations as to a major portion of the account, plaintiff\u2019s evidence on motion for summary judgment that a true copy of the account had been mailed to defendant\u2019s intestate did not show that the account had been converted from an open account to an account stated where there was no showing as to when the account was mailed, and evidence that a payment had been made on the account by Medicare did not show as a matter of law that a payment had been made by the debtor which would toll the statute of limitations; therefore, the trial court erred in granting summary judgment for plaintiff for the entire amount of the account.\nAppeal by defendant from Lyon, District Court Judge, 26 November 1973 Session of District Court held in Lee County.\nOn 28 September 1973, plaintiff sued on an account totaling $719.20 alleged to be due from defendant\u2019s intestate.\nDefendant admits a debt of $42.00 but pleads the statute of limitations as to the other items in the account.\nDefendant moved for summary judgment as to all the account except $42.00. Plaintiff moved for summary judgment and, in support of the motion, filed a copy of the account and an affidavit by his bookkeeper. The copy of the account indicated a balance of $250.00 in 1965 and showed entries for services to and including 6 March 1971. The last payment by defendant was on 11 September 1968. One entry disclosed a payment on the account by Medicare on 6 May 1970. Included in the affidavit is a statement that a true copy of the account had been mailed to A. C. Harris, defendant\u2019s intestate. The date of the alleged mailing is not specified. Harris is alleged to have died on 14 September 1972.\nPlaintiff\u2019s motion for summary judgment was allowed, and judgment was entered in his favor for $719.20.\nW. W. Seymour by H. Clinton Cheshire for plaintiff ap-pellee.\nRonald T. Penny for defendant appellant."
  },
  "file_name": "0075-01",
  "first_page_order": 107,
  "last_page_order": 108
}