{
  "id": 8548192,
  "name": "CONNIE B. SHELTON v. JESSE T. SHELTON",
  "name_abbreviation": "Shelton v. Shelton",
  "decision_date": "1974-09-18",
  "docket_number": "No. 7417DC666",
  "first_page": "115",
  "last_page": "116",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "23 N.C. App. 115"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C. Ct. App.",
    "id": 14983,
    "name": "North Carolina Court of Appeals"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 126,
    "char_count": 1497,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.605,
    "sha256": "8f7aea54e6b06c4d9a0f06539eed7fddde6dea8c136bc14a86e946cd2cd0c28b",
    "simhash": "1:b24886a52f17a4e8",
    "word_count": 258
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:32:39.683180+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [
      "Judges Britt and Baley concur."
    ],
    "parties": [
      "CONNIE B. SHELTON v. JESSE T. SHELTON"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "HEDRICK, Judge.\nThis is an appeal from an order allowing plaintiff\u2019s motion for alimony pendente lite, custody and support of minor children, and counsel fees. Appellant\u2019s sole assignment of error is to the signing and entry of the judgment. Such an assignment of error presents the face of the record for review, and review is limited to the question of whether error of law appears on the face of the record, which includes whether the facts found or admitted, support the conclusions of law and the judgment. But, such an assignment of error does not present for review the findings of fact or the sufficiency of the evidence to support them. 1 Strong, N. C. Index 2d, Appeal and Error, \u00a7 26, p. 152.\nSuffice it to say, therefore, we have carefully examined the face of the record and find no error thereon. The findings of fact, which are in considerable detail, support the conclusions of law, which in turn support the order appealed from.\nAffirmed.\nJudges Britt and Baley concur.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "HEDRICK, Judge."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Folger & Folger by Fred Folger, Jr., for plaintiff appellee.",
      "W. Warren Sparrow for defendant appellant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "CONNIE B. SHELTON v. JESSE T. SHELTON\nNo. 7417DC666\n(Filed 18 September 1974)\nAppeal and Error \u00a7 26\u2014 assignment of error to signing and entry of judgment\nAssignment of error to the signing and entry of judgment presents only the face of the record for review.\nAppeal by defendant from Clark, Judge, 1 March 1974 Session of District Court held in SURRY County. Heard in the Court of Appeals 28 August 1974.\nFolger & Folger by Fred Folger, Jr., for plaintiff appellee.\nW. Warren Sparrow for defendant appellant."
  },
  "file_name": "0115-01",
  "first_page_order": 143,
  "last_page_order": 144
}