{
  "id": 8548283,
  "name": "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. JOHN QUICK",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Quick",
  "decision_date": "1974-09-18",
  "docket_number": "No. 7418SC673",
  "first_page": "119",
  "last_page": "119",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "23 N.C. App. 119"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C. Ct. App.",
    "id": 14983,
    "name": "North Carolina Court of Appeals"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 139,
    "char_count": 1453,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.555,
    "sha256": "0adc5a596880ec4b5ede11f58b4adbaeac986d341d1a8a5affd26bed0fecca5f",
    "simhash": "1:8da3234427bba1e9",
    "word_count": 242
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:32:39.683180+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [
      "Judges Parker and Vaughn concur."
    ],
    "parties": [
      "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. JOHN QUICK"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "CAMPBELL, Judge.\nThe evidence on behalf of the State was sufficient to require submission of the case to the jury. Counsel for defendant frankly admits that no prejudical error was committed at trial. The State in its brief agrees. We have examined the various assignments of error and the record proper and find no prejudicial error.\nAffirmed.\nJudges Parker and Vaughn concur.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "CAMPBELL, Judge."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Attorney General Robert Morgan by Associate Attorney Keith L. Jarvis for the State.",
      "Hugh C. Bennett, Jr., for the defendant appellant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. JOHN QUICK\nNo. 7418SC673\n(Filed 18 September 1974)\nAppeal by defendant from Copeland, Special Judge, 22 April 1974 Regular Criminal Session of Guilford Superior Court, High Point Division. Heard in the Court of Appeals 27 August 1974.\nDefendant was charged in a bill of indictment with assault with intent to commit rape in violation of G.S. 14-22. Defendant pleaded not guilty and was tried by a jury.\nThe State offered evidence tending to show that the defendant actually committed an assault with intent to force Jeanette Little, a female, age twelve (12) years, to have sexual relations with him and that she was afraid for her physical safety.\nThe defendant\u2019s evidence was principally that of the defendant\u2019s own denial of the charges, and other evidence seeking to show that he was not with Jeanette Little on the day in question.\nThe jury returned a verdict of guilty as charged in the bill of indictment.\nAttorney General Robert Morgan by Associate Attorney Keith L. Jarvis for the State.\nHugh C. Bennett, Jr., for the defendant appellant."
  },
  "file_name": "0119-01",
  "first_page_order": 147,
  "last_page_order": 147
}