{
  "id": 8549056,
  "name": "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. FRANKLIN HAWLEY",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Hawley",
  "decision_date": "1974-10-02",
  "docket_number": "No. 749SC574",
  "first_page": "223",
  "last_page": "224",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "23 N.C. App. 223"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C. Ct. App.",
    "id": 14983,
    "name": "North Carolina Court of Appeals"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "86 S.E. 2d 76",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "year": 1955,
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "241 N.C. 572",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8614273
      ],
      "year": 1955,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/241/0572-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "180 S.E. 2d 464",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "year": 1971,
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "11 N.C. App. 200",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        8553923
      ],
      "year": 1971,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc-app/11/0200-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "200 S.E. 2d 837",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "year": 1973,
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "20 N.C. App. 207",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        8550977
      ],
      "year": 1973,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc-app/20/0207-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "167 S.E. 2d 522",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "year": 1969,
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "4 N.C. App. 672",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        8555493
      ],
      "year": 1969,
      "pin_cites": [
        {
          "page": "673"
        }
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc-app/4/0672-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 159,
    "char_count": 2145,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.608,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.20586895220532161
    },
    "sha256": "85c5153eb35c31df1c156e3dc6ee1f0326a8694951b679e239aac8b5a2cde852",
    "simhash": "1:14fee5c81e494c6e",
    "word_count": 363
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:32:39.683180+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [
      "Chief Judge Brock and Judge Morris concur."
    ],
    "parties": [
      "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. FRANKLIN HAWLEY"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "MARTIN, Judge.\nThere is nothing in the record to disclose how the superior court obtained jurisdiction of this case. \u201cThe Court of Appeals will take notice ex mero motu of the failure of the record to show jurisdiction in the court entering the judgment appealed from.\u201d State v. Byrd, 4 N.C. App. 672, 673, 167 S.E. 2d 522 (1969). It is the duty of the defendant appellant to see that the record on appeal is properly made up and transmitted to the Court of Appeals. State v. Parks, 20 N.C. App. 207, 200 S.E. 2d 837 (1973) ; State v. Marshall, 11 N.C. App. 200, 180 S.E. 2d 464 (1971) ; State v. Byrd, supra. The superior court has no jurisdiction to try an accused for a misdemeanor upon a warrant of the district court unless he is first tried and convicted for such misdemeanor in the district court and appeals to the superior court from the sentence imposed in the district court. State v. Parks, supra; State v. Marshall, supra; State v. Byrd, supra. For failure to show jurisdiction, the appeal must be dismissed. State v. Banks, 241 N.C. 572, 86 S.E. 2d 76 (1955); State v. Marshall, supra.\nAppeal dismissed.\nChief Judge Brock and Judge Morris concur.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "MARTIN, Judge."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Attorney General Carson, by Assistant Attorney General Raymond W. Dew, Jr. and Associate Attorney John R. Morgan, for the State.",
      "Smith & Banks, for defendant appellant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. FRANKLIN HAWLEY\nNo. 749SC574\n(Filed 2 October 1974)\nCriminal Law \u00a7\u00a7 18, 157\u2014 misdemeanor \u2014 failure to show jurisdiction of superior court\nAppeal is dismissed for failure of the record to show how the superior court obtained jurisdiction of a misdemeanor tried upon a warrant of the district court.\nAppeal by defendant from Bailey, Judge, February 1974 Criminal Session of Granville Superior Court.\nThe record filed indicates that defendant was tried in the Superior Court on warrants charging him with the misdemeanors of reckless driving and driving while his operator\u2019s license was revoked. The solicitor took a nol pros, with leave on the charge of reckless driving. Defendant was found guilty of driving while his license was revoked and was sentenced to be imprisoned for two years.\nAttorney General Carson, by Assistant Attorney General Raymond W. Dew, Jr. and Associate Attorney John R. Morgan, for the State.\nSmith & Banks, for defendant appellant."
  },
  "file_name": "0223-01",
  "first_page_order": 251,
  "last_page_order": 252
}