{
  "id": 8549159,
  "name": "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. BARRY LEE CHAPPELL",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Chappell",
  "decision_date": "1974-10-02",
  "docket_number": "No. 749SC702",
  "first_page": "228",
  "last_page": "229",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "23 N.C. App. 228"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C. Ct. App.",
    "id": 14983,
    "name": "North Carolina Court of Appeals"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "197 S.E. 142",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "213 N.C. 648",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8629940,
        8629958
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/213/0648-01",
        "/nc/213/0648-02"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 141,
    "char_count": 1556,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.583,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 5.12982294956584e-08,
      "percentile": 0.32363855962258803
    },
    "sha256": "ffa237e64e79deb1e8ea0aebdcd83c8f934a17e88b7d0b37351b4923469038b1",
    "simhash": "1:06cc406aa712d2a3",
    "word_count": 262
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:32:39.683180+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [
      "Judges Campbell and Parker concur."
    ],
    "parties": [
      "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. BARRY LEE CHAPPELL"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "VAUGHN, Judge.\nDefendant\u2019s court appointed counsel contends that it was error for the judge to fail to instruct the jury that they were to use their own memory in recalling the evidence and that they were not to take his recapitulation of the evidence as fact. Defendant did not request the Court to give that instruction and it is not required in the absence of a request. State v. Harris, 213 N.C. 648, 197 S.E. 142.\nDefendant has brought forward other assignments of error which we find to be without merit. We find no prejudicial error in defendant\u2019s trial.\nNo error.\nJudges Campbell and Parker concur.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "VAUGHN, Judge."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Attorney General James H. Carson, Jr., by Walter E. Ricks 111, Assistant Attorney General, and C. Diederich Heidgerd, Associate Attorney, for the State.",
      "Burke and King by Ronnie P. King for defendant appellant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. BARRY LEE CHAPPELL\nNo. 749SC702\n(Filed 2 October 1974)\nCriminal Law \u00a7\u00a7 113, 119\u2014 instructions on evidence \u2014 instructions not requested\nIn the absence of a request, the trial court was not required to instruct the jury that they were to use their own memory in recalling the evidence and that they were not to take his recapitulation of the evidence as fact.\nAppeal by defendant from Bailey, Judge, 18 February 1974 Session of Superior Court held in Person County.\nDefendant was convicted of resisting a public officer while the officer was attempting to arrest defendant, a violation of G.S. 14-223. After a verdict of guilty, judgment was entered imposing an active sentence within the limits provided by law.\nAttorney General James H. Carson, Jr., by Walter E. Ricks 111, Assistant Attorney General, and C. Diederich Heidgerd, Associate Attorney, for the State.\nBurke and King by Ronnie P. King for defendant appellant."
  },
  "file_name": "0228-01",
  "first_page_order": 256,
  "last_page_order": 257
}