{
  "id": 8549567,
  "name": "WILEY EVERETTE PHILLIPS v. CURRIE MILLS, INC.",
  "name_abbreviation": "Phillips v. Currie Mills, Inc.",
  "decision_date": "1974-12-04",
  "docket_number": "No. 7419SC803",
  "first_page": "143",
  "last_page": "144",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "24 N.C. App. 143"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C. Ct. App.",
    "id": 14983,
    "name": "North Carolina Court of Appeals"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "179 S.E. 2d 900",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "year": 1971,
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "10 N.C. App. 742",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        8555759
      ],
      "year": 1971,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc-app/10/0742-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 134,
    "char_count": 1605,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.603,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 1.0052889892850951e-07,
      "percentile": 0.5405019752116822
    },
    "sha256": "2180cbc9520f5a9ac615e527dfffa8b6c4f1a7acd33b6542e4af1dd13fdb5dff",
    "simhash": "1:8e0299a33a4cc077",
    "word_count": 272
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:54:40.635509+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [
      "Judges Campbell and Mor\u00e9is concur."
    ],
    "parties": [
      "WILEY EVERETTE PHILLIPS v. CURRIE MILLS, INC."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "MARTIN, Judge.\nG.S. 1-83 (2) provides that the court may change the place of trial \u201c[w]hen the convenience of witnesses and the ends of justice would be promoted by the change.\u201d A motion for change of venue for the convenience of witnesses and to. promote the ends of justice is addressed to the sound discretion of the trial judge, and his action thereon is not r.eviewable on appeal unless an abuse of discretion is shown. Piner v. Truck Rentals, 10 N.C. App. 742, 179 S.E. 2d 900 (1971).\nAppellant has failed to show any abuse of discretion in the trial court\u2019s action.\nAffirmed.\nJudges Campbell and Mor\u00e9is concur.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "MARTIN, Judge."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Ottway Burton, for plaintiff appellant.",
      "Boyette and Boyette, by M. G. Boyette, Sr., for defendant appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "WILEY EVERETTE PHILLIPS v. CURRIE MILLS, INC.\nNo. 7419SC803\n(Filed 4 December 1974)\nVenue \u00a7 8\u2014 change for convenience of parties and witnesses \u2014 discretionary matter\nA motion for change of venue for the convenience of witnesses and to promote the ends of justice is addressed to the sound discretion of the trial judge,- and his action thereon is not reviewable on appeal unless an abuse of discretion is shown.\nAppeal by plaintiff from Crissman, Judge, B June 1974 Session of Superior Court held in Randolph County. Heard in the Court of Appeals on 18 November 1974.\nThis is an action for damages sustained by plaintiff when he fell into a well located on defendant\u2019s property. Defendant moved for a change of venue to Moore County pursuant to G.S. 1-83(2). Based upon affidavits and testimony given at a hearing, the trial court granted defendant\u2019s motion.\nPlaintiff appealed.\nOttway Burton, for plaintiff appellant.\nBoyette and Boyette, by M. G. Boyette, Sr., for defendant appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0143-01",
  "first_page_order": 171,
  "last_page_order": 172
}