{
  "id": 8550770,
  "name": "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. WILLIE WHITE",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. White",
  "decision_date": "1974-12-18",
  "docket_number": "No. 7426SC566",
  "first_page": "318",
  "last_page": "319",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "24 N.C. App. 318"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C. Ct. App.",
    "id": 14983,
    "name": "North Carolina Court of Appeals"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "194 S.E. 2d 839",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "year": 1973,
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "283 N.C. 33",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8557615
      ],
      "year": 1973,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/283/0033-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "373 U.S. 83",
      "category": "reporters:federal",
      "reporter": "U.S.",
      "case_ids": [
        11716714
      ],
      "weight": 3,
      "year": 1973,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/us/373/0083-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 184,
    "char_count": 2249,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.595,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 5.8591662004228935e-08,
      "percentile": 0.3669345201206711
    },
    "sha256": "d688aa9507ab98c25ee728b6351a6e5e431d21726fcd0d6d15f36d6ea78cadda",
    "simhash": "1:ad2e858c7f2245f9",
    "word_count": 380
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:54:40.635509+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [
      "Judges Parker and Martin concur."
    ],
    "parties": [
      "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. WILLIE WHITE"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "BROCK, Chief Judge.\nDefendant argues one assignment of error. He argues on appeal that the trial judge committed error in \u201cprecluding defendant\u2019s counsel from gaining access to statements made by-witnesses.\u201d Defendant argues the principles of Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed. 2d 215. The principles of Brady have been recognized recently by our Supreme Court in State v. Gaines, 283 N.C. 33, 194 S.E. 2d 839 (1973), and by this Court in State v. Chavis, et al. (filed 18 December 1974). However, counsel\u2019s argument of those principles in this case seems wide of the mark.\nAfter reviewing the record on appeal in this case, we cannot find that such a question was raised in the trial or was passed on by the judge. The only question about a statement of a witness was raised during cross-examination of one of the investigating officers. It appears that the officer wanted to look at something to refresh his recollection. Counsel insisted that, if the witness were going to use notes to refresh his recollection, counsel was entitled to see the notes also. No ruling by the judge appears in the record on appeal. In any event the witness did not use notes to refresh his recollection.\nNo error.\nJudges Parker and Martin concur.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "BROCK, Chief Judge."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Attorney General Carson, by Assistant Attorney General Murray, for the State.",
      "Levine & Goodman, by Arthur Goodman, Jr., for the defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. WILLIE WHITE\nNo. 7426SC566\n(Filed 18 December 1974)\nCriminal Law \u00a7 146 \u2014 question not raised in trial court \u2014 no showing of error on appeal\nDefendant failed to show that the trial judge committed error in \u201cprecluding defendant\u2019s counsel from gaining access to statements made by witnesses\u201d where the record does not show that such a question was raised in the trial or was passed on by the judge.\nAppeal by defendant from Falls, Judge, 18 February 1974 Session of Superior Court held in Mecklenburg County. Argued in the Court of Appeals 14 October 1974.\nDefendant was charged with assault with a deadly weapon with intent to .kill and inflicting serious bodily injury. G;S. 14-32(a). The .jury verdict was guilty of assault with a deadly weapon and inflicting serious injury. G.S. 14-32 (b). An active prison sentence was imposed.\nAttorney General Carson, by Assistant Attorney General Murray, for the State.\nLevine & Goodman, by Arthur Goodman, Jr., for the defendant."
  },
  "file_name": "0318-01",
  "first_page_order": 346,
  "last_page_order": 347
}