{
  "id": 8552416,
  "name": "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. EARL EUGENE CHANDLER",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Chandler",
  "decision_date": "1975-06-18",
  "docket_number": "No. 7528SC300",
  "first_page": "346",
  "last_page": "347",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "26 N.C. App. 346"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C. Ct. App.",
    "id": 14983,
    "name": "North Carolina Court of Appeals"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 102,
    "char_count": 930,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.567,
    "sha256": "3739aa144b6f222747f0e199fbad249f0895943518a09cf61429b2cc6ed522ac",
    "simhash": "1:8a1e787bcc6f2082",
    "word_count": 150
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:59:13.418266+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [
      "Judges Britt and Hedrick concur."
    ],
    "parties": [
      "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. EARL EUGENE CHANDLER"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "MARTIN, Judge.\nCounsel for defendant admits that he is unable to find prejudicial error in the trial. We have carefully examined the record and are also of the opinion that defendant has received a fair trial free from prejudicial error.\nNo error.\nJudges Britt and Hedrick concur.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "MARTIN, Judge."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Attorney General Edmisten, by Associate Attorney Wilton E. Ragland, Jr., for the State.",
      "Robert L. Harrell, for defendant appellant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. EARL EUGENE CHANDLER\nNo. 7528SC300\n(Filed 18 June 1975)\nAppeal by defendant from Snepp, Judge. Judgment entered 11 February 1975 in Superior Court, Buncombe County. Heard in the Court of Appeals 12 June 1975.\nDefendant was charged with operating a motor vehicle on the public highways while under the influence of intoxicating liquor. After a plea of not guilty, defendant was tried before a jury and found guilty of the offense. From judgment entered upon the verdict, defendant appealed.\nAttorney General Edmisten, by Associate Attorney Wilton E. Ragland, Jr., for the State.\nRobert L. Harrell, for defendant appellant."
  },
  "file_name": "0346-01",
  "first_page_order": 374,
  "last_page_order": 375
}