{
  "id": 8554101,
  "name": "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. EARL DOUGLAS STOKES and WAYNE EARL WATKINS",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Stokes",
  "decision_date": "1975-07-02",
  "docket_number": "No. 7518SC181",
  "first_page": "527",
  "last_page": "528",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "26 N.C. App. 527"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C. Ct. App.",
    "id": 14983,
    "name": "North Carolina Court of Appeals"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "212 S.E. 2d 171",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "year": 1975,
      "pin_cites": [
        {
          "page": "172"
        }
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "24 N.C. App. 687",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        8554403
      ],
      "year": 1975,
      "pin_cites": [
        {
          "page": "688"
        }
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc-app/24/0687-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 163,
    "char_count": 1959,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.606,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.2059824723371903
    },
    "sha256": "c02865f10ed2db485a316df59915757f8cf15a689bae7139d698a2e0e4cd0515",
    "simhash": "1:888c26c95e43992e",
    "word_count": 337
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:59:13.418266+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [
      "Chief Judge Brock and Judge Hedrick concur."
    ],
    "parties": [
      "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. EARL DOUGLAS STOKES and WAYNE EARL WATKINS"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "MORRIS, Judge.\nThe judgments in this case were entered on 17 October 1974. The record on appeal was filed more than 90 days later, on 5 March 1975. The trial court granted motion 'of defendants\u2019 court appointed counsel for an extension of time to.serve the case on appeal but no order was entered extending the time for docketing the record on appeal. \u201c [A] n order extending the time within which to serve the case on appeal does not have th\u00e9 effect of extending the time to docket the appeal,\u201d State v. Hopkins, 24 N.C. App. 687, 688, 212 S.E. 2d 171, 172 (1975); and, in accordance with the practice of this Court, the defendants\u2019 appeal is dismissed for failure to comply with the rules of this Court. Rule 5, Rules of Practice in the Court of Appeals of North Carolina.\nAppeal dismissed.\nChief Judge Brock and Judge Hedrick concur.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "MORRIS, Judge."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Attorney General Edmisten, by Associate Attorney DavidS. Crump, for the State.",
      "Z. H. Howerton, Jr., for defendant appellants."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. EARL DOUGLAS STOKES and WAYNE EARL WATKINS\nNo. 7518SC181\n(Filed 2 July 1975)\nCriminal-Law \u00a7 155.5 \u2014 failure to docket record in apt time\nAppeal is dismissed for failure to docket the record on appeal within 90 days after the date of the judgment appealed from, the time for docketing not having been extended by the court\u2019s order extending the time for serving, the case on appeal. Court of Appeals Rule 5.\nAp:E>EA:L by defendants from Rousseau, Judge. Judgments entered 17 October 1974, in Superior Court, Guilford County. Heard in the Court of Appeals 13 May 1975.\nThese cases were consolidated for trial. Both defendants were charged with armed robbery. Upon their pleas of not guilty, the jury returned verdicts of guilty as charged against both defendants. From judgments sentencing each of them to imprisonment for. a term of not less than 25 nor more than 30 years, with credit to both defendants for 58 days spent in jail awaiting trial, defendants appealed. \u2022\nAttorney General Edmisten, by Associate Attorney DavidS. Crump, for the State.\nZ. H. Howerton, Jr., for defendant appellants."
  },
  "file_name": "0527-01",
  "first_page_order": 555,
  "last_page_order": 556
}