{
  "id": 8553510,
  "name": "MARY ELIZABETH WORTHINGTON v. SOLOMAN ALLEY WORTHINGTON",
  "name_abbreviation": "Worthington v. Worthington",
  "decision_date": "1975-11-05",
  "docket_number": "No. 758DC385",
  "first_page": "340",
  "last_page": "340",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "27 N.C. App. 340"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C. Ct. App.",
    "id": 14983,
    "name": "North Carolina Court of Appeals"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 111,
    "char_count": 1208,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.56,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 2.7558660147140523e-07,
      "percentile": 0.8331522416943999
    },
    "sha256": "71d8c1307c23c9775ecc0602619acb9405b0fd436f1e7721eba279e086e12c52",
    "simhash": "1:922f7ba22f770f5a",
    "word_count": 204
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T22:44:36.927205+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [
      "Judges Morris and Clark concur."
    ],
    "parties": [
      "MARY ELIZABETH WORTHINGTON v. SOLOMAN ALLEY WORTHINGTON"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "VAUGHN, Judge.\nAlthough we express no opinion on whether we would have reached the same result on the evidence before the court at the hearing for alimony pendente lite, there is some evidence to support the findings of fact made by the trial judge, and we are bound by them. The findings of fact are sufficient to support the order and it is affirmed.\nAffirmed.\nJudges Morris and Clark concur.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "VAUGHN, Judge."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Jones and Wooten, by Lamar Jones, for 'plaintiff appellee.",
      "Turner and Harrison, by J. Harry Turner and Fred W. Harrison, for defendant appellant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "MARY ELIZABETH WORTHINGTON v. SOLOMAN ALLEY WORTHINGTON\nNo. 758DC385\n(Filed 5 November 1975)\nAppeal and Error \u00a7 57\u2014 findings supported by evidence \u2014 court on appeal bound\nThe court on appeal is bound by the findings of fact made by the trial court where there is some evidence to support those findings.\nAppeal by defendant from Nowell, Judge. Judgment entered 17 February 1975 in District Court, Lenoir County. Heard in the Court of Appeals 3 September 1975.\nDefendant, age 68, appeals from an order directing him to pay alimony pendente lite and counsel fees to plaintiff from whom he was separated on 29 December 1974 following their marriage on 26 December 1974.\nJones and Wooten, by Lamar Jones, for 'plaintiff appellee.\nTurner and Harrison, by J. Harry Turner and Fred W. Harrison, for defendant appellant."
  },
  "file_name": "0340-01",
  "first_page_order": 368,
  "last_page_order": 368
}