{
  "id": 8548007,
  "name": "IVORY M. WHITE and husband, DAVID WHITE, JR. v. EARL RAY ASKEW and wife, CATHERINE ASKEW; EMMA ASKEW TAYLOR and husband, JAMES TAYLOR; FRANCES ASKEW HOGGARD and husband, FRANK HOGGARD; NEAL ASKEW and wife, BARBARA ASKEW; CLARENCE TAYLOR and wife, HATTIE L. TAYLOR; KELLY SAUNDERS and wife, OLA MAE SAUNDERS; CARLTON MITCHELL; GLORIA BAXTER and husband, JESSIE BAXTER; GRACE ASKEW; AUDREY ASKEW; JANICE RAE ASKEW; SHIRLEY RUTH ASKEW; MILTON DAVIS ASKEW; WRIGHT ASKEW, JR. and wife, MARY ANN ASKEW; and FLETCHER MAE ASKEW",
  "name_abbreviation": "White v. Askew",
  "decision_date": "1975-12-17",
  "docket_number": "No. 756SC492",
  "first_page": "225",
  "last_page": "225",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "28 N.C. App. 225"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C. Ct. App.",
    "id": 14983,
    "name": "North Carolina Court of Appeals"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 171,
    "char_count": 1946,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.575,
    "sha256": "9c68788a7f95bbab1ca038b66c93c03d427b3be3dbe97e7adb8680e172d4c6fc",
    "simhash": "1:dadd2a63cd4d7635",
    "word_count": 309
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T22:58:46.500479+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [
      "Chief Judge Brock and Judge Martin concur."
    ],
    "parties": [
      "IVORY M. WHITE and husband, DAVID WHITE, JR. v. EARL RAY ASKEW and wife, CATHERINE ASKEW; EMMA ASKEW TAYLOR and husband, JAMES TAYLOR; FRANCES ASKEW HOGGARD and husband, FRANK HOGGARD; NEAL ASKEW and wife, BARBARA ASKEW; CLARENCE TAYLOR and wife, HATTIE L. TAYLOR; KELLY SAUNDERS and wife, OLA MAE SAUNDERS; CARLTON MITCHELL; GLORIA BAXTER and husband, JESSIE BAXTER; GRACE ASKEW; AUDREY ASKEW; JANICE RAE ASKEW; SHIRLEY RUTH ASKEW; MILTON DAVIS ASKEW; WRIGHT ASKEW, JR. and wife, MARY ANN ASKEW; and FLETCHER MAE ASKEW"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "VAUGHN, Judge.\nNeither the bench nor the bar could benefit from a recital of the history of the title to the land in question. Petitioners-entered no exceptions to the court\u2019s findings of fact. The findings of fact supported the conclusion of law. Moreover, the undisputed facts would have required the judge to reach the identical conclusion of law.\nThe judgment is affirmed.\nAffirmed.\nChief Judge Brock and Judge Martin concur.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "VAUGHN, Judge."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Leroy, Wells, Shaw, Hornthal, Riley & Shearin, P.A., by J. Fred Riley, for petitioner appellants.",
      "Gillam & Gillam, by M. B. Gillam, Jr., for defendant ap-pellees."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "IVORY M. WHITE and husband, DAVID WHITE, JR. v. EARL RAY ASKEW and wife, CATHERINE ASKEW; EMMA ASKEW TAYLOR and husband, JAMES TAYLOR; FRANCES ASKEW HOGGARD and husband, FRANK HOGGARD; NEAL ASKEW and wife, BARBARA ASKEW; CLARENCE TAYLOR and wife, HATTIE L. TAYLOR; KELLY SAUNDERS and wife, OLA MAE SAUNDERS; CARLTON MITCHELL; GLORIA BAXTER and husband, JESSIE BAXTER; GRACE ASKEW; AUDREY ASKEW; JANICE RAE ASKEW; SHIRLEY RUTH ASKEW; MILTON DAVIS ASKEW; WRIGHT ASKEW, JR. and wife, MARY ANN ASKEW; and FLETCHER MAE ASKEW\nNo. 756SC492\n(Filed 17 December 1975)\nPartition \u00a7 8 \u2014 sale for partition \u2014 determination of ownership\nIn an action to sell land for partition, the trial court properly determined that petitioners had no interest in one of the tracts.\nAppeal by petitioners from Winner, Judge. Judgment entered 20 March 1975 in Superior Court, Bertie County. Heard in the Court of Appeals 24 September 1975.\nPetitioners started a special proceeding to sell certain landi for division among the several tenants in common. Respondents-denied that petitioners had any interest in one of the tracts. The case was then transferred to the civil issue docket where-it was tried by the judge without a jury. The judge made findings of fact and entered judgment consistent with respondents\u2019' contention that petitioners had no interest in the disputed tract..\nLeroy, Wells, Shaw, Hornthal, Riley & Shearin, P.A., by J. Fred Riley, for petitioner appellants.\nGillam & Gillam, by M. B. Gillam, Jr., for defendant ap-pellees."
  },
  "file_name": "0225-01",
  "first_page_order": 253,
  "last_page_order": 253
}