{
  "id": 8554337,
  "name": "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. LOTHAR LYNCH",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Lynch",
  "decision_date": "1968-12-11",
  "docket_number": "No. 687SC388",
  "first_page": "228",
  "last_page": "229",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "3 N.C. App. 228"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C. Ct. App.",
    "id": 14983,
    "name": "North Carolina Court of Appeals"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 209,
    "char_count": 2699,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.58,
    "sha256": "4ca7d3cdcd16e698800fcfe061313c6ae2aed14c097965b7b15b709dfcb42a7e",
    "simhash": "1:b3e323724a2d5864",
    "word_count": 450
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:33:22.618564+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [
      "Campbell and Mohris, JJ., concur."
    ],
    "parties": [
      "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. LOTHAR LYNCH"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mallard, C.J.\nEach of defendant\u2019s assignments of error relating to the admission of evidence has been carefully examined and is found to be without merit. They require no extended discussion and are overruled.\nDefendant contends that the trial court committed error in overruling his motion for judgment as of nonsuit at the close of the evidence. The defendant was charged with breaking and entering Edge-combe County A.B.C. Store #5, at Whitakers, on 30 October 1967 and stealing therefrom three cases of taxpaid whiskey of the value of $178.80. Defendant\u2019s nephew, Kenneth Lynch, an accomplice in the crime, testified as a witness for the State that the defendant ripped the back screen door out and broke in the back door of the whiskey store, and after entering the store handed him three cases of whiskey from inside the store. Kenneth testified that after receiving the whiskey from the defendant, he put it in the alley. At about that time the police came, the defendant ran \u201cthrough the front door,\u201d and the police shot at him three times. The defendant offered no evidence. There was substantial direct evidence of every element of the crimes charged. The trial court did'not commit error in overruling the motion for nonsuit. See 3 Strong, N. C. Index 2d, Criminal Law, \u00a7 176.\nDefendant also contends that the court committed error in its charge to the jury and argues, among other things, that the. general manner and tone of part of the charge \u201carrayed the evidence unequally against the defendant.\u201d We have carefully read the entire charge and find no prejudicial error that would entitle the defendant to a new trial.\nDefendant has other assignments of error. Each has been carefully examined and no error is found therein.\nWe are of the opinion and so hold that the defendant has had a fair trial, free from prejudicial error.\nNo error.\nCampbell and Mohris, JJ., concur.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mallard, C.J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Attorney General T. W. Bruton and Assistant Attorney General George A. Goodwyn for the State.",
      "George M. Britt for the defendant appellant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. LOTHAR LYNCH\nNo. 687SC388\n(Filed 11 December 1968)\nBurglary and Unlawful Breakings \u00a7 5; Larceny \u00a7-7 \u2014 r- sufficiency of the evidence\nEvidence of defendant\u2019s, guilt of the felonies of breaking and entering an ABC store and larceny is held sufficient to be submitted to the jury.\nAppeal by defendant from Parker, J., April 1968 Regular Session of Superior Court of Edgecombe County. -\nDefendant was charged in a bill' of indictment with the felonies of breaking and entering and larceny.\nTrial was by jury. The verdict was guilty as charged. From judgment imposing a prison sentence, the defendant appeals to the Court of Appeals, assigning error.\nAttorney General T. W. Bruton and Assistant Attorney General George A. Goodwyn for the State.\nGeorge M. Britt for the defendant appellant."
  },
  "file_name": "0228-01",
  "first_page_order": 248,
  "last_page_order": 249
}