{
  "id": 8554424,
  "name": "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. JAMES A. WILLIAMS",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Williams",
  "decision_date": "1968-12-11",
  "docket_number": "No. 6821SC458",
  "first_page": "233",
  "last_page": "234",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "3 N.C. App. 233"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C. Ct. App.",
    "id": 14983,
    "name": "North Carolina Court of Appeals"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "163 S.E. 2d 78",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "2 N.C. App. 406",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        8553519
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc-app/2/0406-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "156 S.E. 2d 857",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "271 N.C. 464",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8564898
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/271/0464-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 126,
    "char_count": 1155,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.597,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 2.740794406665402e-07,
      "percentile": 0.8319152969922184
    },
    "sha256": "75626d80fb1e6b9a44344e71adc4d33d77af7eacbc2ea8338228c829411843ae",
    "simhash": "1:1a214d749a32b2ea",
    "word_count": 187
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:33:22.618564+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [
      "BeocK and PaeKEk, JJ., concur."
    ],
    "parties": [
      "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. JAMES A. WILLIAMS"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Beitt, J.\nDefendant\u2019s court-appointed counsel brings forward no assignment of error, frankly stating that he is unable to find prejudicial error but asks the court to carefully review the record and grant such relief as may be proper.\nAccordingly, we have carefully reviewed the record before us and find that the defendant was given a fair trial, free from prejudicial error, and that the sentence imposed was within statutory limits. State v. Hopper, 271 N.C. 464, 156 S.E. 2d 857; State v. Campbell, 2 N.C. App. 406, 163 S.E. 2d 78.\nThe judgment of the superior court is\nAffirmed.\nBeocK and PaeKEk, JJ., concur.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Beitt, J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Attorney General T. Wade Bruton and Deputy Attorney General Harry W. McGalliard for the State.",
      "Hatfield, Allman & Hall hy Raymond D. Thomas for defendant appellant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. JAMES A. WILLIAMS\nNo. 6821SC458\n(Filed 11 December 1968)\nAppeal by defendant from Armstrong, J., at the 27 May 1968 Criminal Session of Foesyth Superior Court.\nBy indictment proper in form, defendant was charged with store-breaking and larceny. The jury found the defendant guilty as charged, and from sentence imposed thereon, defendant appealed.\nAttorney General T. Wade Bruton and Deputy Attorney General Harry W. McGalliard for the State.\nHatfield, Allman & Hall hy Raymond D. Thomas for defendant appellant."
  },
  "file_name": "0233-01",
  "first_page_order": 253,
  "last_page_order": 254
}