{
  "id": 8554798,
  "name": "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. JAMES ELLIS COOPER",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Cooper",
  "decision_date": "1968-12-18",
  "docket_number": "No. 6827SC462",
  "first_page": "308",
  "last_page": "309",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "3 N.C. App. 308"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C. Ct. App.",
    "id": 14983,
    "name": "North Carolina Court of Appeals"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "2 N.C. App. 583",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        8554566
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc-app/2/0583-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 140,
    "char_count": 1653,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.582,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 2.4548587003634884e-07,
      "percentile": 0.8046463326626379
    },
    "sha256": "e1d3a068438fbac967f635f3923ed53bf05d4cae1413c5d2eebac47bac8b55cc",
    "simhash": "1:1fb7f67d73fe88bb",
    "word_count": 274
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:33:22.618564+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [
      "Beitt and PakKEb, JJ., concur."
    ],
    "parties": [
      "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. JAMES ELLIS COOPER"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Brook, J.\nThe crux of defendant's appeal relates to his exception to the introduction of an unverified copy of commitment taken from the defendant\u2019s file at the prison unit from which he is alleged to have escaped. This exhibit was offered by the State to show the lawfulness of defendant\u2019s confinement at the time of the alleged escape. This commitment contained the signature of an assistant clerk of Superior Court of Mecklenburg County, and bore the imprint of the official seal of the Clerk of Superior Court of Mecklenburg County.\nThis precise question has been decided adversely to defendant\u2019s position in the case of State v. Beamon, 2 N.C. App. 583, filed 16 October 1968. Upon authority of Beamon defendant\u2019s assignments of error are overruled.\nNo error.\nBeitt and PakKEb, JJ., concur.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Brook, J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "T. W. Bruton, Attorney General, by Dale Shepherd, Staff Attorney, for the State.",
      "Verne E. Shive for the defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. JAMES ELLIS COOPER\nNo. 6827SC462\n(Filed 18 December 1968)\nEscape \u00a7 1; Criminal Law . \u00a7 40\u2014 admissibility of commitment\nIn a prosecution for felonious escape, an unverified copy of a commit? ment containing the signature of an assistant clerk of Superior Court and bearing the seal of the clerk of the Superior Court is admissible to show the lawfulness of defendant\u2019s confinement at the time of the alleged escape.\nAppeal by defendant from Snepp, J., 22 July 1968 Session, GastoN Superior Court.\nDefendant was tried upon an indictment charging him with a felonious escape. The jury returned a verdict of guilty as charged. From the verdict and judgment of imprisonment for a period of two years defendant appealed.\nT. W. Bruton, Attorney General, by Dale Shepherd, Staff Attorney, for the State.\nVerne E. Shive for the defendant."
  },
  "file_name": "0308-01",
  "first_page_order": 328,
  "last_page_order": 329
}