{
  "id": 8551764,
  "name": "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. PATRICIA ANN McKENZIE",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. McKenzie",
  "decision_date": "1976-07-07",
  "docket_number": "No. 7620SC74",
  "first_page": "64",
  "last_page": "67",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "30 N.C. App. 64"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C. Ct. App.",
    "id": 14983,
    "name": "North Carolina Court of Appeals"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "160 S.E. 2d 550",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "year": 1968,
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "1 N.C. App. 199",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        8551345
      ],
      "year": 1968,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc-app/1/0199-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 354,
    "char_count": 5758,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.659,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 2.38648277059564e-07,
      "percentile": 0.7973974544461858
    },
    "sha256": "550e24887681ae102d521f465e65b925ebbecfefb8bde6ca34da69e031613703",
    "simhash": "1:819d0761df773cae",
    "word_count": 959
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:42:34.327987+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [
      "Judges Hedrick and Clark concur."
    ],
    "parties": [
      "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. PATRICIA ANN McKENZIE"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "BROCK, Chief Judge.\nThis case was properly consolidated for trial with similar charges against Eugene McKenzie and Frederick Cottingham. Mr. Benny S. Sharpe was appointed to represent this appealing defendant, as well as defendant Eugene McKenzie, at trial and on appeal to this Court. Mr. Donald M. Dawkins was appointed to represent defendant Frederick Cottingham at trial and on appeal to this Court. Nevertheless, on appeal Messrs. Sharpe and Dawkins caused three separate records on appeal to be filed in this Court as cases numbers 7620SC74 (Patricia Ann McKenzie), 7620SC75 (Eugene McKenzie), and 7620SC80 (Frederick Cottingham). The costs, respectively, of printing these three records on appeal were: $150.15, $155.10, and $243.48. Since each of the defendants was found to be indigent, fees for counsel at trial and on appeal are provided by the State. Also the expenses of docketing and printing the three records on appeal and printing of the briefs are provided by the State. Even if defendants were personally paying counsel fees and court costs, the preparation of three separate records on appeal would be unnecessary expenses for counsel to incur for their clients. Furthermore, it is improper procedure for counsel to file three separate records on appeal from a trial at which the three cases were consolidated. Aside from the question of the unnecesary expenses, the filing of three separate records on appeal creates the undue burden on the appellate courts of having to read three when one would have sufficed. Rule 11(d) of the North Carolina Rules of Appellate Procedure specifically addresses this subject. It provides for a single record on appeal and the methods of accomplishing a single record on appeal.\nWhen the court has ordered consolidation of cases or charges for trial, counsel cannot, of his own enterprise, sever the cases or charges and appeal each separately in the absence of a showing of compelling circumstances. Clearly the fact of indigency should not be considered by a defendant as a license to be a spendthrift with taxpayers\u2019 money. State v. Squires, 1 N.C. App. 199, 160 S.E. 2d 550 (1968).\nRule 9(b)(5) of the North Carolina Rules of Appellate Procedure provides: \u201cIt shall be the duty of counsel for all parties to an appeal to avoid including in the record on appeal matter not necessary for an understanding of the errors assigned. The cost of including such matter may be charged as costs to the party or counsel who caused or permitted its inclusion.\u201d\nBy appealing these three cases separately, counsel has prepared and caused to be printed two redundant records on appeal; these records on appeal constitute matter not necessary for an understanding of the errors assigned. There has been no showing of compelling circumstances to justify the filing of three records on appeal instead of one. Consequently, counsel, Mr. Benny S. Sharpe, will be personally taxed with costs in the sum of $150.00. In State v. Cottingham, in an opinion filed contemporaneously herewith, counsel, Mr. Donald M. Dawkins, will be personally taxed with costs in the sum of $150.00.\nUpon the merits of the appeal in this case, we have fully examined defendant\u2019s assignments of error and find them to be without merit. In our view defendant received a fair trial free from prejudicial error.\nNo error.\nJudges Hedrick and Clark concur.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "BROCK, Chief Judge."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Attorney General Edmisten, by Assistant Attorney General Robert G. Webb, for the State.",
      "Benny S. Sharpe for the defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. PATRICIA ANN McKENZIE\nNo. 7620SC74\n(Filed 7 July 1976)\n1. Criminal Law \u00a7 154\u2014 consolidated trial of defendants \u2014 severance of cases on appeal\nWhen the court has ordered consolidation of cases or charges for trial, counsel cannot, of his own enterprise, sever the cases or charges and appeal each separately in the absence of a showing of compelling circumstances. App. R. 11(d).\n2. Criminal Law \u00a7\u00a7 145, 154\u2014 consolidated trial of defendants \u2014 multiple records on appeal \u2014 taxing of costs against attorneys\nWhere attorneys appointed to represent three defendants in an appeal from a consolidated trial of defendants for the same offense caused three separate records on appeal to be filed in the appellate court, the attorneys were taxed with the costs of printing the two redundant records on appeal. App. R. 9(b) (5).\nAppeal by defendant from Barbee, Judge. Judgment entered 15 October 1975 in Superior Court, Richmond County. Heard in the Court of Appeals 6 May 1976.\nDefendant was charged in a bill of indictment, proper in form, with the felony of assault with a deadly weapon with intent to kill, inflicting serious injury upon one Wesley Long on 13 July 1975.\nThe State\u2019s evidence tended to show the following: Wesley Long went to the Blue Bird Lounge at about 11:00 p.m. on 13 July 1975. Long did not know defendant or her husband Eugene McKenzie or Frederick Cottingham. Long went to the rest room and, upon emerging from it, was struck and knocked down by Eugene McKenzie. Long got a cue stick and pursued Eugene McKenzie into the parking lot. Once there Cottingham grabbed, held and cut Long several times with a knife. Eugene McKenzie also cut Long several times while Cottingham held Long. Long fell to the ground, and defendant jumped upon him and cut him several times with a knife. Finally Long was able to flee across the street, where he collapsed in front of Mom and Pop\u2019s Restaurant; shortly thereafter he was carried to the hospital by the rescue squad. Long sustained multiple cuts to his face and back, which required several hundred sutures to repair. Defendant offered evidence which tended to show that she did not cut Long.\nThe jury found defendant guilty as charged, and a prison term of twelve years was imposed.\nAttorney General Edmisten, by Assistant Attorney General Robert G. Webb, for the State.\nBenny S. Sharpe for the defendant."
  },
  "file_name": "0064-01",
  "first_page_order": 92,
  "last_page_order": 95
}
