{
  "id": 8555248,
  "name": "TIMOTHY DANIEL LINEBERRY v. TONY (NMN) WILSON",
  "name_abbreviation": "Lineberry v. Wilson",
  "decision_date": "1978-06-06",
  "docket_number": "No. 7721SC666",
  "first_page": "649",
  "last_page": "650",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "36 N.C. App. 649"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C. Ct. App.",
    "id": 14983,
    "name": "North Carolina Court of Appeals"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 162,
    "char_count": 1908,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.763,
    "sha256": "368407019c2e498fc6446c44d5b1d7406509ee1cf899ac1a1a017f64118cf2d2",
    "simhash": "1:ddf323b75d07b072",
    "word_count": 301
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T17:02:41.791978+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [
      "Judges Morris and Martin concur."
    ],
    "parties": [
      "TIMOTHY DANIEL LINEBERRY v. TONY (NMN) WILSON"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "VAUGHN, Judge.\nThis is an action to recover damages for injuries allegedly suffered by plaintiff when struck by an automobile operated by defendant. Defendant answered and denied negligence, among other things. Thereafter, plaintiff moved to amend his complaint to \u201c[a]dd Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company to the list of defendants\u201d and, in substance, to allege that defendant had in effeet an automobile liability insurance policy with Nationwide. Plaintiff now attempts to appeal from the denial of his motion. The purported appeal is not from an order \u201cwhich affects a substantial right claimed in any action or proceeding; or which in effect determines the action, and prevents a judgment from which an appeal might be taken; or discontinues the action, or grants or refuses a new trial.\u201d G.S. l-277(a). The attempted appeal is, therefore, fragmentary and premature.\nWe must also note that appellant has attempted to file a \u201cReply Brief,\u201d a practice expressly prohibited by Rule 28(h) of the Rules of Appellate Procedure.\nThe appeal is dismissed.\nDismissed.\nJudges Morris and Martin concur.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "VAUGHN, Judge."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Jenkins, Lucas, Babb and Rabil, by Jonathan V. Maxwell, for plaintiff appellant.",
      "Hudson, Petree, Stockton, Stockton & Robinson, by James H. Kelly, Jr., and Grover C. Wilson, for defendant appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "TIMOTHY DANIEL LINEBERRY v. TONY (NMN) WILSON\nNo. 7721SC666\n(Filed 6 June 1978)\nAppeal and Error \u00a7 6.7\u2014 denial of motion to add liability insurer as defendant\u2014 premature appeal\nPurported appeal from the denial of plaintiff\u2019s motion to amend his complaint to add defendant\u2019s automobile liability insurer as a party defendant in plaintiff\u2019s action to recover for injuries suffered when he was struck by defendant\u2019s automobile is dismissed as premature. G.S. l-277(a).\nAppeal by plaintiff from Albright, Judge. Order entered 20 June 1977 in Superior Court, FORSYTH County. Heard in the Court of Appeals 23 May 1978.\nJenkins, Lucas, Babb and Rabil, by Jonathan V. Maxwell, for plaintiff appellant.\nHudson, Petree, Stockton, Stockton & Robinson, by James H. Kelly, Jr., and Grover C. Wilson, for defendant appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0649-01",
  "first_page_order": 677,
  "last_page_order": 678
}
