{
  "id": 8551873,
  "name": "E. LOIS LAND v. LESTER T. LAND",
  "name_abbreviation": "Land v. Land",
  "decision_date": "1969-02-26",
  "docket_number": "No. 6922SC97",
  "first_page": "115",
  "last_page": "116",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "4 N.C. App. 115"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C. Ct. App.",
    "id": 14983,
    "name": "North Carolina Court of Appeals"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "64 S.E. 2d 843",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "233 N.C. 551",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8612814
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/233/0551-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 144,
    "char_count": 1674,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.593,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 1.4975956836136062e-07,
      "percentile": 0.6649686912248552
    },
    "sha256": "d1e6b46d45576df720580f43ef9a039c727a4f8417c7fb20337c72915df8d6cc",
    "simhash": "1:24da7c8b2ee16ced",
    "word_count": 291
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:50:38.610889+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [
      "Campbell and Mohsis, JJ., concur."
    ],
    "parties": [
      "E. LOIS LAND v. LESTER T. LAND"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Brock, J.\nNo briefs have been filed, nor was oral argument undertaken. Exceptions in the record not set out in appellant\u2019s brief, or in support of which no reason or argument is stated or authority cited, will be taken as abandoned by him. Rule 28, Rules of Practice in the Court of Appeals of North Carolina. Failure by appellant to file a brief works an abandonment of his assignments of error, except those appearing upon the face of the record proper, which are cognizable ex mero motu. Dillard v. Brown, 233 N.C. 551, 64 S.E. 2d 843.\nError does not appear upon the face of the record.\nAppeal dismissed.\nCampbell and Mohsis, JJ., concur.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Brock, J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "E. W. Hooper and L. D. McGuire for plaintiff appellee.",
      "Clarence C. Boyan for defendant appellant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "E. LOIS LAND v. LESTER T. LAND\nNo. 6922SC97\n(Filed 26 February 1969)\n1. Appeal and Error \u00a7 45\u2014 the brief \u2014 failure to discuss exceptions\nExceptions in the record not set out in appellant\u2019s brief, or in support of which no reason or argument is stated or authority cited, will be taken as abandoned by him. Rule of Practice in the Court of Appeals No. 28.\n2. Appeal and Error \u00a7 44\u2014 the brief \u2014 effect of failure to file\nFailure by appellant to file a brief works an abandonment of his assignments of error, except those appearing upon the face of the record proper, which are cognizable ea> mero motu.\nAppeal by defendant from Johnston, J., 9 September 1968 Session, Davidson Superior Court.\nPlaintiff brought this action to have the court declare that defendant holds title to certain real estate as trustee for plaintiff.\nFrom a verdict and judgment in accordance with plaintiff\u2019s prayer for relief, defendant gave notice of appeal.\nE. W. Hooper and L. D. McGuire for plaintiff appellee.\nClarence C. Boyan for defendant appellant."
  },
  "file_name": "0115-01",
  "first_page_order": 135,
  "last_page_order": 136
}