{
  "id": 8553162,
  "name": "MILLER GRADING and CONSTRUCTION COMPANY v. MARIE LUCKEY",
  "name_abbreviation": "Miller Grading & Construction Co. v. Luckey",
  "decision_date": "1979-12-18",
  "docket_number": "No. 7927DC394",
  "first_page": "378",
  "last_page": "378",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "44 N.C. App. 378"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C. Ct. App.",
    "id": 14983,
    "name": "North Carolina Court of Appeals"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "257 S.E. 2d 668",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "year": 1979,
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "42 N.C. App. 724",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        8555834
      ],
      "year": 1979,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc-app/42/0724-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "258 S.E. 2d 357",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "year": 1979,
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "298 N.C. 231",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8569817
      ],
      "year": 1979,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/298/0231-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 128,
    "char_count": 1474,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.787,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.20595718128740323
    },
    "sha256": "990060c6075261e444daecb0ad7441b28ee92f919b5903ef2521ec1b40966621",
    "simhash": "1:8b654669ad2fb80a",
    "word_count": 248
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T22:44:31.887789+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [
      "Judges Vaughn and Webb concur."
    ],
    "parties": [
      "MILLER GRADING and CONSTRUCTION COMPANY v. MARIE LUCKEY"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "MARTIN (Harry C.), Judge.\nAppellant violated Rule 9(c)(4) of the North Carolina Rules of Appellate Procedure by failing to number the pages of the record on appeal. She also violated Rule 10(a), (c), by failing to make her exceptions in the record the basis of assignments of error and failing to list the exceptions after the assignments of error with identification of the pages in the record where they appear. In her brief, defendant failed to refer to the assignments of error and exceptions pertinent to the questions argued and failed to refer to pages of the record where they appear. This violates App. R. 28(b)(3).\nExceptions not preserved and set forth as required by the Rules are deemed abandoned. For these reasons the appeal is subject to dismissal. The Rules of Appellate Procedure are mandatory. Craver v. Craver, 298 N.C. 231, 258 S.E. 2d 357 (1979); State v. Brown, 42 N.C. App. 724, 257 S.E. 2d 668 (1979).\nAppeal dismissed.\nJudges Vaughn and Webb concur.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "MARTIN (Harry C.), Judge."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Frank B. Rankin for plaintiff appellee.",
      "Paul E. Hemphill for defendant appellant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "MILLER GRADING and CONSTRUCTION COMPANY v. MARIE LUCKEY\nNo. 7927DC394\n(Filed 18 December 1979)\nAppeal and Error \u00a7 30.2\u2014 exceptions not properly preserved\nExceptions not preserved and set forth as required by the Rules of Appellate Procedure are deemed abandoned.\nAPPEAL by defendant from Bulwinkle, Judge. Order filed 23 February 1979 in District Court, GASTON County. Heard in the Court of Appeals 4 December 1979.\nFrank B. Rankin for plaintiff appellee.\nPaul E. Hemphill for defendant appellant."
  },
  "file_name": "0378-01",
  "first_page_order": 406,
  "last_page_order": 406
}