{ "id": 8549635, "name": "ANGELA MARIE BRIDGES, Daughter; MARGIE FOX BRIDGES, Alleged Widow; and the Estate of ROBERT J. BRIDGES, DECEASED, Employee, Plaintiffs v. McCRARY STONE SERVICES, INC. Employer and IOWA NATIONAL MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Carrier, Defendants", "name_abbreviation": "Bridges v. McCrary Stone Services, Inc.", "decision_date": "1980-08-05", "docket_number": "No. 7910IC1160", "first_page": "185", "last_page": "189", "citations": [ { "type": "official", "cite": "48 N.C. App. 185" } ], "court": { "name_abbreviation": "N.C. Ct. App.", "id": 14983, "name": "North Carolina Court of Appeals" }, "jurisdiction": { "id": 5, "name_long": "North Carolina", "name": "N.C." }, "cites_to": [ { "cite": "224 S.E. 2d 287", "category": "reporters:state_regional", "reporter": "S.E.2d", "year": 1976, "opinion_index": 0 }, { "cite": "29 N.C. App. 386", "category": "reporters:state", "reporter": "N.C. App.", "case_ids": [ 8555996 ], "year": 1976, "opinion_index": 0, "case_paths": [ "/nc-app/29/0386-01" ] }, { "cite": "159 S.E. 2d 874", "category": "reporters:state_regional", "reporter": "S.E.2d", "year": 1968, "opinion_index": 0 }, { "cite": "273 N.C. 240", "category": "reporters:state", "reporter": "N.C.", "case_ids": [ 8575029 ], "year": 1968, "opinion_index": 0, "case_paths": [ "/nc/273/0240-01" ] }, { "cite": "232 S.E. 2d 449", "category": "reporters:state_regional", "reporter": "S.E.2d", "year": 1977, "opinion_index": 0 }, { "cite": "292 N.C. 210", "category": "reporters:state", "reporter": "N.C.", "case_ids": [ 8567907 ], "year": 1977, "opinion_index": 0, "case_paths": [ "/nc/292/0210-01" ] }, { "cite": "101 S.E. 2d 40", "category": "reporters:state_regional", "reporter": "S.E.2d", "year": 1957, "opinion_index": 0 }, { "cite": "247 N.C. 332", "category": "reporters:state", "reporter": "N.C.", "case_ids": [ 8626948 ], "year": 1957, "opinion_index": 0, "case_paths": [ "/nc/247/0332-01" ] }, { "cite": "N.C. Gen. Stat. \u00a7 97-37", "category": "laws:leg_statute", "reporter": "N.C. Gen. Stat.", "weight": 2, "opinion_index": 0 }, { "cite": "267 S.E. 2d 566", "category": "reporters:state_regional", "reporter": "S.E.2d", "year": 1980, "opinion_index": 0 }, { "cite": "47 N.C. App. 434", "category": "reporters:state", "reporter": "N.C. App.", "case_ids": [ 8549943 ], "year": 1980, "opinion_index": 0, "case_paths": [ "/nc-app/47/0434-01" ] } ], "analysis": { "cardinality": 469, "char_count": 8488, "ocr_confidence": 0.713, "pagerank": { "raw": 6.793637240583493e-08, "percentile": 0.4156759718423738 }, "sha256": "eaab7d527b545330ba848cf86ee2cfb5245db25353cb5df1fae7643da818c746", "simhash": "1:14bfa567d69a7a0e", "word_count": 1354 }, "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:18:20.579461+00:00", "provenance": { "date_added": "2019-08-29", "source": "Harvard", "batch": "2018" }, "casebody": { "judges": [ "Chief Judge Morris and Judge Clark concur." ], "parties": [ "ANGELA MARIE BRIDGES, Daughter; MARGIE FOX BRIDGES, Alleged Widow; and the Estate of ROBERT J. BRIDGES, DECEASED, Employee, Plaintiffs v. McCRARY STONE SERVICES, INC. Employer and IOWA NATIONAL MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Carrier, Defendants" ], "opinions": [ { "text": "ERWIN, Judge.\nDefendant makes two contentions on appeal: (1) the Industrial Commission erred in failing to give due consideration to the fact of the employee\u2019s death when determining the amount of compensation to be awarded for his disfigurement; and (2) the Commission abused its discretion in awarding the plaintiffs $7,500 as compensation for the deceased employee\u2019s disfigurement. We do not agree.\nThe first issue presented in this case was decided by this Court in Wilhite v. Liberty Veneer Company, 47 N.C. App. 434, 267 S.E. 2d 566 (1980). Wilhite held that dependents of an employee who suffers a serious bodily disfigurement due to an accident covered by the Worker\u2019s Compensation Act, but who dies due to an unrelated cause, are entitled to a post mortem award for serious bodily disfigurement. Judge Clark, writing for the Court in Wilhite, stated:\n\u201cThe introductory language of N.C. Gen. Stat. 97-31, however, does not account for the possibility that death from another cause may cut off the healing period. The better rule, we think, is expressed by Professor Larson:\n\u2018[I]f the injured employee dies before stabilization has taken place, the degree of impairment should not be taken as that in effect at the moment of death. The proper procedure is to make the best possible medical estimate of the probable residual disability that would have remained if the employee had lived to complete his healing period.\u2019\n2 Larson, Workmen\u2019s Compensation Law, \u00a7 58-40 at 10-258 to -259 (1976). This result, we think, is more consonant with N.C. Gen. Stat. \u00a7 97-37, which provides in relevant part:\n\u2018Where injured employee dies before total compensation is paid. \u2014 When an employee receives or is entitled to compensation under this Article for an injury covered by G.S. 97-31 and dies from any other cause than the injury for which he was entitled to compensation, payment of the unpaid balance of compensation shall be made: First to the surviving whole dependents ... in lieu of the compensation the employee would have been entitled had he lived.\u2019 (Emphasis supplied.)\nThis determination, however, does not quite resolve the question before us because no claim for disfigurement was filed before decedent\u2019s death and no adjudication of such claim was made before his death. The appellees argue that N.C. Gen. Stat. \u00a7 97-37, supra, only applies when the \u2018employee receives or is entitled to compensation\u2019 under the Act and that he cannot be so entitled if no adjudication has been made prior to his death.\u201d\nWe do not agree with defendant\u2019s contention which suggests that the employee\u2019s death should ipso facto reduce benefits due pursuant to G.S. 97-31(21) and payable pursuant to G.S. 97-37.\nThe Commission found:\n\u201cPlaintiff was 38 years old at the time of his death and he retained disfigurement on areas of the body other than the hands, which disfigurement is depicted by photographs which were stipulated into evidence by the parties. Such photographs show some generalized scarring on plaintiff\u2019s arms, which scarring is not particularly noticeable, as well as some scarring on the front portion of plaintiff\u2019s body, particularly just below the neck. Plaintiff\u2019s face was almost completely covered with disfigurement, which gave the skin a slickish appearance, as well as a considerable amount of reddish discoloration which covered the major portion of the face. In addition, it appeared that approximately 25 percent of plaintiffs right ear was missing, and the lips, particularly the lower lip, appeared to be quite inflamed and puffy, giving the face an almost grotesque appearance. [Such disfigurement was permanent and serious and marred plaintiffs appearance to such an extent that, had he lived, such disfigurement would tend to affect his future earning capacity and would have tended to so reduce his future earning capacity. The fair and equitable amount of compensation for such disfigurement under the terms of the Workman\u2019s Compensation Act is $7,500.]\u201d\nThe record shows and the Commission found that the bodily disfigurement was serious and permanent and that such would affect the employee\u2019s future earning capacity as the statute requires before compensation can be awarded. See Davis v. Construction Co., 247 N.C. 332, 101 S.E. 2d 40 (1957). The parties agreed to the evidence the Commission would consider in this case, and there is not any contention that such evidence was not the best possible evidence that was available or that it was inadequate in any manner. ,\nWe do not find any abuse of discretion on the part of the Commission. The Commission made adequate findings of fact based upon competent evidence. This Court\u2019s duty in this compensation case goes no further than to determine whether the record contains any evidence tending to support the findings. Inscoe v. Industries, Inc., 292 N.C. 210, 232 S.E. 2d 449 (1977). Hollman v. City of Raleigh, 273 N.C. 240, 159 S.E. 2d 874 (1968). We hold that there was sufficient, competent evidence before the Commission to support its findings of fact and that the findings of fact of the Commissiortjustify its legal conclusions. Inscoe v. Industries, Inc., supra; Willis v. Reidsville Drapery Plant, 29 N.C. App. 386, 224 S.E. 2d 287 (1976). We find the opinion and award of the Commission to be proper in all respects. The record completely fails to show any abuse of discretion on the part of the Commission.\nJudgment affirmed.\nChief Judge Morris and Judge Clark concur.", "type": "majority", "author": "ERWIN, Judge." } ], "attorneys": [ "Brock,Begely&Drye, by FloydD.Brock, forplaintiff appel-lees.", "Van Winkle, Buck, Wall, Starnes & Davis, by Russell P. Brannon, for defendant appellant." ], "corrections": "", "head_matter": "ANGELA MARIE BRIDGES, Daughter; MARGIE FOX BRIDGES, Alleged Widow; and the Estate of ROBERT J. BRIDGES, DECEASED, Employee, Plaintiffs v. McCRARY STONE SERVICES, INC. Employer and IOWA NATIONAL MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Carrier, Defendants\nNo. 7910IC1160\n(Filed 5 August 1980)\n1. Master and Servant \u00a7 74- workers\u2019 compensation \u2014 disfigurement - post mor-tem award to dependents\nDependents of an employee who suffers a serious bodily disfigurement due to an accident covered by the Workers\u2019 Compensation Act, but who dies due to an unrelated cause, are entitled to a post mortem award for serious bodily disfigurement.\n2. Master and Servant \u00a7 74- workers\u2019 compensation - award for disfigurement - no abuse of discretion\nThe Industrial Commission did not abuse its discretion in awarding a deceased employee\u2019s dependents $7500 for serious bodily disfigurement of the employee where the parties agreed to the evidence which the Commission would consider in this case; the evidence tended to show that deceased had been burned and had some scarring on his arms and chest and serious disfigurement of his face; the disfigurement was permanent; and the disfigurement would affect the employee\u2019s future earning capacity.\nAppeal by Iowa National Mutual Insurance Company, insurer, from opinion and award of the North Carolina Industrial Commission entered 8 October 1979. Heard in the Court of Appeals 19 May 1980.\nThe deceased employee sustained an injury by accident arising out of and in the course of his employment on 30 January 1975, wherein he sustained severe burns over several portions of his body and face. Defendants admitted liability and paid the deceased employee compensation benefits for his period of temporary total disability. Thereafter on 7 November 1977, the employee died from causes other than the accident.\nOn 25 May 1979, a hearing was held to determine the entitlement of the deceased employee\u2019s dependents to compensation for permanent partial disability and disfigurement. On the basis of submitted medical reports, Chief Deputy Commissioner Shuford filed an opinion and award on 19 June 1979 in which he awarded benefits pursuant to G.S. 97-31(12) on the grounds that the deceased employee sustained a thirty-two percent permanent partial disability of the left hand and an eleven percent permanent partial disability of the right hand. Defendants do not object to that portion of the award. On the basis of photographs submitted by the plaintiffs, which showed generalized scarring of the deceased employee\u2019s arms and neck and severe scarring of the face, the hearing commissioner also entered an award for disfigurement pursuant to G.S. 97-31(21) and (22) in the amount of $7,500. This award was entered despite the employee\u2019s death. Upon appeal by defendants, the full commission affirmed the results. Iowa National Mutual Insurance Company appealed.\nBrock,Begely&Drye, by FloydD.Brock, forplaintiff appel-lees.\nVan Winkle, Buck, Wall, Starnes & Davis, by Russell P. Brannon, for defendant appellant." }, "file_name": "0185-01", "first_page_order": 213, "last_page_order": 217 }