{
  "id": 8553306,
  "name": "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. LEROY STAFFORD",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Stafford",
  "decision_date": "1980-09-16",
  "docket_number": "No. 8030SC319",
  "first_page": "740",
  "last_page": "741",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "48 N.C. App. 740"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C. Ct. App.",
    "id": 14983,
    "name": "North Carolina Court of Appeals"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "299 N.C. 123",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8573984,
        8573957,
        8574022,
        8574003,
        8573972
      ],
      "year": 1980,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/299/0123-03",
        "/nc/299/0123-01",
        "/nc/299/0123-05",
        "/nc/299/0123-04",
        "/nc/299/0123-02"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "257 S.E. 2d 668",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "year": 1979,
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "42 N.C. App. 724",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        8555834
      ],
      "year": 1979,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc-app/42/0724-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "258 S.E. 2d 357",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "year": 1979,
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "298 N.C. 231",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8569817
      ],
      "year": 1979,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/298/0231-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 151,
    "char_count": 1611,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.696,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.20595949802478833
    },
    "sha256": "e60d0ed5acb8aac27520e4b141a06955fb1c984741ecf94294472bfe23bafb87",
    "simhash": "1:b5c41429052db076",
    "word_count": 273
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:18:20.579461+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [
      "Judges Clark and Martin (Harry C.) concur."
    ],
    "parties": [
      "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. LEROY STAFFORD"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "HILL, Judge.\nDefendant has violated App. R. 10(b) and (c) by failing to set forth any exceptions following the judicial action of which he complains and by failing to base his assignments of error on proper exceptions. Exceptions not preserved and set forth as required by the Appellate Rules are deemed abandoned. The Rules of Appellate Procedure are mandatory. Craver v. Craver, 298 N.C. 231, 258 S.E. 2d 357 (1979); State v. Brown, 42 N.C. App. 724, 257 S.E. 2d 668 (1979), disc. rev. denied, 299 N.C. 123 (1980).\nWe have carefully examined the record on appeal in light of the provisions of Appellate Rule 2,.which permits this Court on its own initiative to vary or waive the rules to prevent manifest injustice. We find the State\u2019s evidence of the defendant\u2019s guilt to be substantial, and we find waiver of the rules in this case is not warranted.\nFor the reasons stated above, the appeal is\nDismissed.\nJudges Clark and Martin (Harry C.) concur.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "HILL, Judge."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Attorney General Edmisten, by Special Deputy Attorney General Thomas F. Moffitt, for the State.",
      "John I. Jay for defendant appellant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. LEROY STAFFORD\nNo. 8030SC319\n(Filed 16 September 1980)\nCriminal Law \u00a7 161- necessity for exceptions and assignments of error\nDefendant violated App. R. 10(b) and (c) by failing to set forth any exceptions following the judicial action of which he complains and by failing to base his assignments of error on proper exceptions.\nAppeal by defendant from Friday, Judge. Judgment entered 9 November 1979 in Superior Court, Haywood County. Heard in the Court of Appeals at Waynesville on 27 August 1980.\nAttorney General Edmisten, by Special Deputy Attorney General Thomas F. Moffitt, for the State.\nJohn I. Jay for defendant appellant."
  },
  "file_name": "0740-01",
  "first_page_order": 768,
  "last_page_order": 769
}