{
  "id": 8553078,
  "name": "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. MARVIN HEATH BENNETT",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Bennett",
  "decision_date": "1969-08-13",
  "docket_number": "No. 6926SC363",
  "first_page": "662",
  "last_page": "662",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "5 N.C. App. 662"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C. Ct. App.",
    "id": 14983,
    "name": "North Carolina Court of Appeals"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "141 S.E. 2d 630",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "264 N.C. 391",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8573489
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/264/0391-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "162 S.E. 2d 78",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "1 N.C. App. 498",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        8554075
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc-app/1/0498-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 158,
    "char_count": 1896,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.53,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 2.0446031217563963e-07,
      "percentile": 0.7530823225601184
    },
    "sha256": "968163fabdd908d803e0389ef9f04a38d194fcf288df7ce6a47c30478b524d33",
    "simhash": "1:57c35441a21ae83b",
    "word_count": 314
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T22:58:43.915660+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [
      "Campbell and BrocK, JJ., concur."
    ],
    "parties": [
      "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. MARVIN HEATH BENNETT"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Morris, J.\nAll of defendant\u2019s purported exceptions and assignments of error are to the charge of the court. However, the portions thereof assigned as error are not set out in the assignments of error, and no exceptions appear with respect thereto except under the purported assignments of error. The portions of the charge to which defendant takes exception are not identified in the record by letters, parentheses, or in any other manner. These purported assignments of error are ineffective to challenge the correctness of the charge. Vail v. Smith, 1 N.C. App. 498, 162 S.E. 2d 78; State v. Dunn, 264 N.C. 391, 141 S.E. 2d 630. For the reasons stated herein, the motion of the State to dismiss the appeal is well taken and is allowed.\nDismissed.\nCampbell and BrocK, JJ., concur.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Morris, J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Attorney General Robert Morgan by Deputy Attorney General Harrison Lewis and Staff Attorney James E. Magner for the State.",
      "Wayne M. Brendle for defendant appellant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. MARVIN HEATH BENNETT\nNo. 6926SC363\n(Filed 13 August 1969)\nCriminal Law \u00a7 163\u2014 assignments of error to the charge \u2014 identifica' tion of portions excepted to\nWhere the portions of the charge to which defendant assigns as error are not identified in the record by letter, parentheses or in any other manner, the purported assignments of error are ineffective to challenge the correctness of the charge.\nAppeal from Falls, J., 8 April 1969 Session of Superior Court of MecKleNburg.\nDefendant was charged with armed robbery and entered a plea of not guilty. He was represented by counsel, but the record is silent as to whether counsel was privately retained or court appointed. The jury returned a verdict of guilty of common law robbery, and from judgment entered thereon, defendant appealed. Upon a finding by the court of defendant\u2019s indigency, counsel who had represented him at trial was appointed to perfect his appeal.\nAttorney General Robert Morgan by Deputy Attorney General Harrison Lewis and Staff Attorney James E. Magner for the State.\nWayne M. Brendle for defendant appellant."
  },
  "file_name": "0662-01",
  "first_page_order": 684,
  "last_page_order": 684
}
