{
  "id": 8524499,
  "name": "MARTHA WOODWORTH v. THOMAS WOODWORTH",
  "name_abbreviation": "Woodworth v. Woodworth",
  "decision_date": "1982-07-06",
  "docket_number": "No. 8112DC1156",
  "first_page": "237",
  "last_page": "238",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "58 N.C. App. 237"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C. Ct. App.",
    "id": 14983,
    "name": "North Carolina Court of Appeals"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "252 S.E. 2d 231",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "year": 1979,
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "40 N.C. App. 227",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        8549543
      ],
      "year": 1979,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc-app/40/0227-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 150,
    "char_count": 1850,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.797,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.20553514896042202
    },
    "sha256": "a88b416168afa513db340bb396068b822286f48eabbb37d0996319103963b210",
    "simhash": "1:b33ec965237c8fc5",
    "word_count": 314
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:20:52.636886+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [
      "Judges Arnold and Wells concur."
    ],
    "parties": [
      "MARTHA WOODWORTH v. THOMAS WOODWORTH"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "HEDRICK, Judge.\nPlaintiff purports to appeal from orders entered in open court on 7 and 13 May 1981 denying plaintiff\u2019s Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss defendant\u2019s motion in the cause, and allowing defendant\u2019s motion in the cause modifying a former order of the court with respect to the care, custody, and control of the minor children born of the marriage between the plaintiff and the defendant.\nThe record reveals, and the plaintiff repeatedly points out, that the orders from which she attempts to appeal were entered in open court on 7 and 13 May 1981, G.S. \u00a7 1A-1, Rule 58; yet, notice of appeal was not given until 17 June 1981. G.S. \u00a7 l-279(c) provides that notice of appeal must be given within ten days after the entry of judgment. Such notice is jurisdictional, and the appellate court obtains no jurisdiction unless this statute is complied with. O\u2019Neill v. Southern National Bank, 40 N.C. App. 227, 252 S.E. 2d 231 (1979). The appeal is dismissed.\nDismissed.\nJudges Arnold and Wells concur.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "HEDRICK, Judge."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "MacRae, MacRae, Perry & Pechmann, by John Pechmann, for the plaintiff appellant.",
      "Blackwell, Thompson, Swaringen, Johnson & Thompson, by E. Lynn Johnson, for the defendant appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "MARTHA WOODWORTH v. THOMAS WOODWORTH\nNo. 8112DC1156\n(Filed 6 July 1982)\nAppeal and Error \u00a7 2\u2014 notice oi appeal given after 10 days \u2014 no jurisdiction in appellate court\nWhere the record reveals that orders from which plaintiff attempts to appeal were entered over one month before notice of appeal was given, under G.S. \u00a7 l-279(c) the appellate court obtained no jurisdiction of the appeal since notice of appeal was not given within 10 days after the entry of judgment.\nAPPEAL by plaintiff from Hair, Judge. Orders entered 7 May 1981, 13 May 1981, 11 June 1981, and 16 July 1981 in District Court, CUMBERLAND County. Heard in the Court of Appeals on 10 June 1982.\nMacRae, MacRae, Perry & Pechmann, by John Pechmann, for the plaintiff appellant.\nBlackwell, Thompson, Swaringen, Johnson & Thompson, by E. Lynn Johnson, for the defendant appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0237-01",
  "first_page_order": 269,
  "last_page_order": 270
}