{
  "id": 8525699,
  "name": "JAMES EDGAR TYNDALL v. DEBORAH TYSON TYNDALL",
  "name_abbreviation": "Tyndall v. Tyndall",
  "decision_date": "1986-05-20",
  "docket_number": "No. 854DC1289",
  "first_page": "722",
  "last_page": "723",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "80 N.C. App. 722"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C. Ct. App.",
    "id": 14983,
    "name": "North Carolina Court of Appeals"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "298 S.E. 2d 338",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "year": 1983,
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "307 N.C. 381",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8562460
      ],
      "year": 1983,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/307/0381-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 179,
    "char_count": 2318,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.765,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 2.208705353199233e-07,
      "percentile": 0.776062619867027
    },
    "sha256": "27358746a877b87ef6b24c5e05c48115f32aac19bf400e055dda13ba3997f2ed",
    "simhash": "1:00a74e612c0f817e",
    "word_count": 358
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:01:08.586003+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [
      "Judges BECTON and COZORT concur."
    ],
    "parties": [
      "JAMES EDGAR TYNDALL v. DEBORAH TYSON TYNDALL"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "PHILLIPS, Judge.\nThe parties were formerly husband and wife. After separating they executed a property division and child support agreement, which was expressly incorporated into the divorce judgment rendered in this action on 15 January 1985. In pertinent part the agreement, executed on 7 December 1983, gave defendant custody of their two minor children and required plaintiff to pay $85 a week for their support. On 15 August 1985 defendant moved that the child support payments be increased. After a hearing thereon the court denied the motion, finding that the circumstances had not materially changed since the divorce judgment- was entered. In appealing defendant does not contend that the circumstances concerning the needs of the children and plaintiffs ability to pay have changed since the divorce was granted; she contends rather that the finding is irrelevant, and that the child support issue should have been determined without regard to previous circumstances since that issue had not been adjudicated theretofore. This contention has no merit. When the parties\u2019 child support agreement was incorporated into the divorce judgment it became an order of court that is modifiable only as other judgments involving child custody and support are modifiable. Walters v. Walters, 307 N.C. 381, 298 S.E. 2d 338 (1983). No grounds for modifying the judgment having been presented, the court\u2019s refusal to disregard the terms of the judgment and make a new, independent determination was correct.\nAffirmed.\nJudges BECTON and COZORT concur.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "PHILLIPS, Judge."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Benjamin R. Warrick for plaintiff appellee.",
      "Bryan, Jones, Johnson & Snow, by Robert C. Bryan, for defendant appellant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "JAMES EDGAR TYNDALL v. DEBORAH TYSON TYNDALL\nNo. 854DC1289\n(Filed 20 May 1986)\nDivorce and Alimony \u00a7 24.5\u2014 child support \u2014 showing of changed circumstances required\nWhen the parties\u2019 child support agreement was incorporated into their divorce judgment, it became an order of the court which was modifiable only upon a showing of changed circumstances, and there was no merit to defendant\u2019s contention that the child support issue should have been determined without regard to previous circumstances.\nAppeal by defendant from Williamson, Judge. Order entered 26 August 1985 in District Court, Sampson County. Heard in the Court of Appeals 16 April 1986.\nBenjamin R. Warrick for plaintiff appellee.\nBryan, Jones, Johnson & Snow, by Robert C. Bryan, for defendant appellant."
  },
  "file_name": "0722-01",
  "first_page_order": 750,
  "last_page_order": 751
}