{
  "id": 8524025,
  "name": "J. W. ROBINSON and wife, LILLIAN ROBINSON v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION and LEE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY",
  "name_abbreviation": "Robinson v. North Carolina Department of Transportation",
  "decision_date": "1988-04-05",
  "docket_number": "No. 8713SC909",
  "first_page": "574",
  "last_page": "576",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "89 N.C. App. 574"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C. Ct. App.",
    "id": 14983,
    "name": "North Carolina Court of Appeals"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "366 S.E. 2d 492",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "year": 1988,
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "89 N.C. App. 572",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        8523996
      ],
      "year": 1988,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc-app/89/0572-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 207,
    "char_count": 2655,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.808,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.20552916405551058
    },
    "sha256": "bae347cfa747041dfaa3b106f7eca993334678138ae4a4927f89478643b4dee3",
    "simhash": "1:b05100f239effe8e",
    "word_count": 401
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T22:39:00.818604+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [
      "Judges PHILLIPS and Cozort concur."
    ],
    "parties": [
      "J. W. ROBINSON and wife, LILLIAN ROBINSON v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION and LEE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "ARNOLD, Judge.\nFor the reasons set forth in Robinson v. N.C. Dept. of Transportation, 89 N.C. App. 572, 366 S.E. 2d 492 (1988), we reverse the order of the superior court.\nReversed and remanded.\nJudges PHILLIPS and Cozort concur.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "ARNOLD, Judge."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Powell and Gore, by William A. Powell, for plaintiff appellants.",
      "Attorney General Lacy H. Thornburg, by Assistant Attorneys General Evelyn M. Coman and David R. Minges, for defendant appellee Department of Transportation."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "J. W. ROBINSON and wife, LILLIAN ROBINSON v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION and LEE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY\nNo. 8713SC909\n(Filed 5 April 1988)\nAPPEAL by plaintiffs from Stephens, Judge. Order entered 29 June 1987 in Superior Court, Brunswick County. Heard in the Court of Appeals 11 February 1988.\nIn the spring of 1985, Lee Construction Company, under contract with the North Carolina Department of Transportation, began construction of a bridge across the Intracoastal Waterway to connect Holden Beach with the mainland via Highway 130. Under the terms of the construction contract, the bridge was to be supported by concrete pile foundations. Lee Construction Company drove the piles 20 to 25 feet into the ground creating vibrations in the surrounding ground. Plaintiffs\u2019 property, located on the west side of Highway 130 and adjacent to the bridge construction, suffered damage.\nIn their complaint, plaintiffs stated that the vibrations caused damage to a residential structure on their property. Specifically, a porch, floor coverings and sheetrock cracked, supporting piers settled, pictures fell from walls, a chandelier fell from the ceiling and floors became unlevel and unsteady. Plaintiffs informed the on-site superintendent of the damage which was occurring but Lee Construction Company continued the pile driving operations.\nPlaintiffs filed this action against the Department of Transportation and Lee Construction Company alleging that they were entitled to recover damages from the Department of Transportation for inverse condemnation under G.S. 136-111 or, in the alternative, that they were entitled to recover damages from Lee Construction Company for trespass.\nThe Department denied plaintiffs\u2019 allegations of damages resulting from the bridge construction and moved to dismiss the action pursuant to Rule 12(b) of the North Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure. Judge Stephens granted the Department\u2019s motion and dismissed the complaint as against the Department of Transportation on the grounds that the complaint failed to state a claim for relief and that the court lacked subject matter and personal jurisdiction. From the order of the trial court, plaintiffs appeal.\nPowell and Gore, by William A. Powell, for plaintiff appellants.\nAttorney General Lacy H. Thornburg, by Assistant Attorneys General Evelyn M. Coman and David R. Minges, for defendant appellee Department of Transportation."
  },
  "file_name": "0574-01",
  "first_page_order": 602,
  "last_page_order": 604
}