{
  "id": 8554311,
  "name": "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. EDSON B. MICKLES",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Mickles",
  "decision_date": "1970-11-18",
  "docket_number": "No. 7026SC632",
  "first_page": "734",
  "last_page": "735",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "9 N.C. App. 734"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C. Ct. App.",
    "id": 14983,
    "name": "North Carolina Court of Appeals"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 157,
    "char_count": 1729,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.52,
    "sha256": "f7c0e136fead6a699dd4d0205850bcadb99dacea9294a35bf61b978831551ed3",
    "simhash": "1:f3cab02469f11e38",
    "word_count": 279
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T14:50:15.842675+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [
      "Judges Morris and Graham concur."
    ],
    "parties": [
      "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. EDSON B. MICKLES"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "BROCK, Judge.\nIt appears that the writ of certiorari was improvidently issued in this case. However, we have carefully reviewed the record and defendant\u2019s assignments of error, and we conclude that defendant had a fair trial free from prejudicial error.\nNo error.\nJudges Morris and Graham concur.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "BROCK, Judge."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Attorney General Morgan by Staff Attorney Blackburn for the State.",
      "Thomas R. Cannon for defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. EDSON B. MICKLES\nNo. 7026SC632\n(Filed 18 November 1970)\nOn certiorari to review trial before Falls, J., 27 October 1969 Session, Mecklenburg Superior Court.\nDefendant was charged with the offenses of felonious breaking or entering, and felonious larceny. Defendant was tried jointly with James Leon Kendrick whose appeal has been considered by opinion filed this same date. The facts as stated there apply equally to this appeal.\nThe State\u2019s evidence tended to show that during the early hours of the morning of 13 August 1969 the Oaklawn Super Market was broken into and a quantity of merchandise was stolen therefrom. Charges of felonious breaking or entering and felonious larceny were also lodged against James Leon Kendrick and Billy Frank Anderson. Mickles, the defendant involved in this appeal, and Kendrick were placed on trial together, and Anderson testified for the State. Kendrick and Mickles offered no evidence.\nThe testimony of Anderson tended to show that Mickles broke and entered the Oaklawn Super Market; that he, Anderson, also went in the building; that Kendrick was standing on the other side of the street; that Anderson and Mickles handed two bags of items taken from the store to Kendrick; and the three then went to an apartment nearby.\nThe jury found Mickles guilty as charged.\nAttorney General Morgan by Staff Attorney Blackburn for the State.\nThomas R. Cannon for defendant."
  },
  "file_name": "0734-01",
  "first_page_order": 758,
  "last_page_order": 759
}
