{
  "id": 8523006,
  "name": "PATTY A. WILSON v. ROBERT B. WILSON, JR.",
  "name_abbreviation": "Wilson v. Wilson",
  "decision_date": "1988-05-08",
  "docket_number": "No. 8721DC987",
  "first_page": "144",
  "last_page": "145",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "90 N.C. App. 144"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C. Ct. App.",
    "id": 14983,
    "name": "North Carolina Court of Appeals"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "285 S.E. 2d 281",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "weight": 2,
      "year": 1981,
      "pin_cites": [
        {
          "page": "282"
        },
        {
          "page": "282"
        }
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "55 N.C. App. 250",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        8527082
      ],
      "weight": 2,
      "year": 1981,
      "pin_cites": [
        {
          "page": "252"
        },
        {
          "page": "252"
        }
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc-app/55/0250-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 168,
    "char_count": 2226,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.767,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.20551584281554638
    },
    "sha256": "28612f29677de6a7f3c5efd7f3bcc3ef912fc4516f53202c67b85abf46110ff7",
    "simhash": "1:f1a65405d66714c8",
    "word_count": 343
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:55:12.261630+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [
      "Judges Eagles and Smith concur."
    ],
    "parties": [
      "PATTY A. WILSON v. ROBERT B. WILSON, JR."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "COZORT, Judge.\nThis appeal is from an order denying alimony pendente lite and attorney fees and is, therefore, subject to dismissal under this Court\u2019s ruling in Stephenson v. Stephenson, 55 N.C. App. 250, 252, 285 S.E. 2d 281, 282 (1981). The appeal is dismissed.\nPlaintiff-wife and defendant-husband were lawfully married on 10 August 1968. They first separated in 1969, reconciled in 1969, separated again in 1970, and, that same year, executed a separation agreement mutually waiving their rights to maintenance, support, alimony, and attorney fees. After numerous reconciliations and separations, the plaintiff filed this action in 1987 requesting alimony pendente lite, permanent alimony, counsel fees, possession of the marital home, and the issuance of protective orders and restraining orders.\nThe district court heard plaintiffs motion for temporary alimony and counsel fees and denied plaintiffs motion for temporary alimony, finding that plaintiff waived her right to temporary alimony when she signed the separation agreement in 1970. Plaintiff appealed the denial of temporary alimony.\nIn Stephenson, 55 N.C. App. at 252, 285 S.E. 2d at 282, this Court held, in an opinion in which all the members of this court concurred, \u201cthat orders and awards pendente lite are interlocutory decrees which necessarily do not affect a substantial right from which lies an immediate appeal pursuant to G.S. 7A-27(d).\u201d Plaintiffs appeal from an order denying alimony pendente lite is\nDismissed.\nJudges Eagles and Smith concur.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "COZORT, Judge."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Meyressa H. Schoonmaker for plaintiff appellant.",
      "Morrow, Alexander, Task, Long & Black, by John F. Morrow and Clifton R. Long, Jr., for defendant appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "PATTY A. WILSON v. ROBERT B. WILSON, JR.\nNo. 8721DC987\n(Filed 8 May 1988)\nDivorce and Alimony \u00a7 18.19\u2014 denial of alimony pendente lite \u2014 interlocutory order \u2014 no appeal\nPlaintiffs appeal from an order denying alimony pendente lite is dismissed since orders and awards pendente lite are interlocutory decrees which necessarily do not affect a substantial right from which lies an immediate appeal.\nAppeal by plaintiff from Harrill, Judge. Order entered 31 August 1987 in District Court, FORSYTH County. Heard in the Court of Appeals 3 March 1988.\nMeyressa H. Schoonmaker for plaintiff appellant.\nMorrow, Alexander, Task, Long & Black, by John F. Morrow and Clifton R. Long, Jr., for defendant appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0144-01",
  "first_page_order": 174,
  "last_page_order": 175
}