{
  "id": 8525717,
  "name": "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. DAVID KNIGHT",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Knight",
  "decision_date": "1990-06-05",
  "docket_number": "No. 8920SC940",
  "first_page": "696",
  "last_page": "697",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "98 N.C. App. 696"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C. Ct. App.",
    "id": 14983,
    "name": "North Carolina Court of Appeals"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "337 S.E.2d 470",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "year": 1985,
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "315 N.C. 157",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        4718474
      ],
      "year": 1985,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/315/0157-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "283 S.E.2d 719",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "year": 1981,
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "304 N.C. 293",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8567490
      ],
      "year": 1981,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/304/0293-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "93 L.Ed.2d 77",
      "category": "reporters:federal",
      "reporter": "L. Ed. 2d",
      "year": 1986,
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "479 U.S. 836",
      "category": "reporters:federal",
      "reporter": "U.S.",
      "case_ids": [
        6340738,
        6341187,
        6339651,
        6340166,
        6341416,
        6339181,
        6341774,
        6340368,
        6339954,
        6340948,
        6338904,
        6339482,
        6339803,
        6341597,
        6338527
      ],
      "year": 1986,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/us/479/0836-10",
        "/us/479/0836-12",
        "/us/479/0836-05",
        "/us/479/0836-08",
        "/us/479/0836-13",
        "/us/479/0836-03",
        "/us/479/0836-15",
        "/us/479/0836-09",
        "/us/479/0836-07",
        "/us/479/0836-11",
        "/us/479/0836-02",
        "/us/479/0836-04",
        "/us/479/0836-06",
        "/us/479/0836-14",
        "/us/479/0836-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "340 S.E.2d 465",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "year": 1986,
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "316 N.C. 111",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        4694881
      ],
      "year": 1986,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/316/0111-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 180,
    "char_count": 2953,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.718,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.20555870245717028
    },
    "sha256": "8cf18b8d2475d7250347b222da4f103e8d9f487c77e44273af3e8aa47a71b9ed",
    "simhash": "1:e7bfc3f8e4775961",
    "word_count": 513
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:26:07.401162+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [
      "Judges ARNOLD and COZORT concur."
    ],
    "parties": [
      "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. DAVID KNIGHT"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "PHILLIPS, Judge.\nIn appealing his conviction of assault with a deadly weapon inflicting serious injury defendant makes three contentions: That there is no evidence that he used a deadly weapon; that the court erred in refusing to charge on simple assault; and in charging that a knife was a deadly weapon, in that th\u00e9re was no evidence that he used a knife. None of the contentions has merit.\nThe deadliness of the weapon used, that it was a knife and that the court\u2019s charge was correct is indicated by evidence to the effect that the victim was seriously cut about the body many times, one of which sliced the end of his nose off. State v. Torain, 316 N.C. 111, 340 S.E.2d 465, cert. denied, 479 U.S. 836, 93 L.Ed.2d 77 (1986); State v. Sturdivant, 304 N.C. 293, 283 S.E.2d 719 (1981). No evidence having been presented that these serious injuries were not inflicted, or that they resulted from a simple assault of some kind, the court was not required to charge on this lesser included offense. State v. Wilson, 315 N.C. 157, 337 S.E.2d 470 (1985).\nNo error.\nJudges ARNOLD and COZORT concur.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "PHILLIPS, Judge."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Attorney General Lacy H. Thornburg, by Associate Attorney General Patricia F. Padgett, for the State.",
      "Charles B. Brooks, II for defendant appellant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. DAVID KNIGHT\nNo. 8920SC940\n(Filed 5 June 1990)\n1. Assault and Battery \u00a7 27 (NCI4th)\u2014 assault with deadly weapon inflicting serious injury \u2014knife \u2014evidence of deadly weapon\nThere was evidence in a prosecution for assault with a deadly weapon inflicting serious injury that defendant used a knife and that it was a deadly weapon in that the victim was seriously cut about the body many times, including having the end of his nose sliced off.\nAm Jur 2d, Assault and Battery \u00a7\u00a7 48, 53.\n2. Assault and Battery \u00a7 37 (NCI4th)\u2014 assault with a deadly weapon inflicting serious injury \u2014 instruction on knife as deadly weapon\nThe trial court in a prosecution for assault with a deadly weapon inflicting serious injury properly charged that a knife was a deadly weapon where the victim was seriously cut about the body many times, including having the end of his nose sliced off.\nAm Jur 2d, Assault and Battery \u00a7 48.\n3. Assault and Battery \u00a7 116 (NCI4th>\u2014 assault with a deadly weapon inflicting serious injury \u2014refusal to charge on simple assault \u2014no error\nThe trial court in a prosecution for assault with a deadly weapon inflicting serious injury was not required to charge on the lesser included offense of simple assault where there was evidence that the victim was seriously cut about the body many times, including having the end of his nose sliced off, and there was no evidence presented that the serious injuries were not inflicted or that they resulted from a simple assault of some kind.\nAm Jur 2d, Assault and Battery \u00a7 50.\nAPPEAL by defendant from judgment entered 13 April 1989 by Judge William H. Helms in UNION County Superior Court. Heard in the Court of Appeals 10 May 1990.\nAttorney General Lacy H. Thornburg, by Associate Attorney General Patricia F. Padgett, for the State.\nCharles B. Brooks, II for defendant appellant."
  },
  "file_name": "0696-01",
  "first_page_order": 724,
  "last_page_order": 725
}
