{
  "id": 12122272,
  "name": "- versus KIMBOROUGH",
  "name_abbreviation": "- v. Kimborough",
  "decision_date": "1790-03",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "25",
  "last_page": "25",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "nominative",
      "cite": "1 Mart. 25"
    },
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "1 N.C. 25"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C. Super. Ct.",
    "id": 22358,
    "name": "North Carolina Superior Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 68,
    "char_count": 576,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.632,
    "sha256": "df89e200aac230fafb6a3dc2c69f447f5a2cb88a631ced0a679d69e6fe17b9cd",
    "simhash": "1:26ef2abfe0962259",
    "word_count": 98
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:17:01.495884+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [
      "Spencer, J. and Williams, J. present."
    ],
    "parties": [
      "- versus KIMBOROUGH."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "KIMBOROUGH, at the last Term, had got a dedimus potestatem to take the testimony of some persons\u2014He had failed in getting the deposition, and the cause came an to trial ; when his counsel filed an affidavit of his, to continue the cause\u2014It was objected that Kimborough had been convicted of passing counterfeited money, an ad suffered punishment; this was admitted: but they argued that he ought to be admitted to make oath, on account of the necessity of the case. Granted by the court.\nSpencer, J. and Williams, J. present.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Salisbury,\nMarch Term, 1790.\n- versus KIMBOROUGH."
  },
  "file_name": "0025-01",
  "first_page_order": 33,
  "last_page_order": 33
}