{
  "id": 12122567,
  "name": "EMSLEY versus LEE",
  "name_abbreviation": "Emsley v. Lee",
  "decision_date": "1790",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "25",
  "last_page": "25",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "nominative",
      "cite": "1 Mart. 25"
    },
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "1 N.C. 25"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C. Super. Ct.",
    "id": 22358,
    "name": "North Carolina Superior Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 49,
    "char_count": 353,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.726,
    "sha256": "aaa0b85b797068692207a6110d8e28de3f91a3090b8b04ef4172715a5521d653",
    "simhash": "1:be3576a4e45f5a55",
    "word_count": 63
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:17:01.495884+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "EMSLEY versus LEE."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "THIS was a suit on a promissory note, to pay \u00a3. 100 sterling, according to the course of exchange. The court said this case is not different from bonds for Virginia money, or Whitmill Hill\u2019s case and others, and charged the jury to find the exchange at 77, 7-9.\nN. B. The jury found, however, the real exchange.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Edenton,\n-Term, 1791.\nEMSLEY versus LEE."
  },
  "file_name": "0025-03",
  "first_page_order": 33,
  "last_page_order": 33
}