{
  "id": 12123034,
  "name": "SMITH versus SMITH's EXECUTORS",
  "name_abbreviation": "Smith v. Smith's Executors",
  "decision_date": "1790",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "26",
  "last_page": "26",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "nominative",
      "cite": "1 Mart. 26"
    },
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "1 N.C. 26"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C. Super. Ct.",
    "id": 22358,
    "name": "North Carolina Superior Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 102,
    "char_count": 886,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.636,
    "sha256": "a315ead6eb866a70ec5adaf072c79683106a840da8e62fba468831f4832d5280",
    "simhash": "1:bc831cab9deed799",
    "word_count": 153
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:17:01.495884+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [
      "But Ashe, J. concurred in the opinion of Johnston."
    ],
    "parties": [
      "SMITH versus SMITH's EXECUTORS."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "William, J. and Spencer, J.\nwho delivered their opinions first, concluded with saying that they would not alter the law which had been so long established, and therefore there was judgment for petitioner.\nBut Ashe, J. concurred in the opinion of Johnston.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "William, J. and Spencer, J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Iredell for the petition infifted,",
      "Johnson for the defendant in answer,"
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Edenton,\n, - Term, 17-.\nSMITH versus SMITH's EXECUTORS.\nIT was admitted on both sides, that the testator died during session, and before the ratification of the act, for that the question was when the act should begin, to operate.\nIredell for the petition infifted,\non the authority of many cases he produced, to show that all acts of the British parliament take effort as effects from the first day of the session, and therefore fic bic.\nJohnson for the defendant in answer,\nrelied on the words and spirit of the Constitution, that the signing of the Speakers is necessary to give the act the sanction of a law.\nSec, XI, p. 270."
  },
  "file_name": "0026-02",
  "first_page_order": 34,
  "last_page_order": 34
}