{
  "id": 12126230,
  "name": "BORDEN versus NASH's ADMINISTRATOR de bonis non",
  "name_abbreviation": "Borden v. Nash's Administrator",
  "decision_date": "1796-09",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "42",
  "last_page": "42",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "nominative",
      "cite": "1 Mart. 42"
    },
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "1 N.C. 42"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C. Super. Ct.",
    "id": 22358,
    "name": "North Carolina Superior Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 104,
    "char_count": 1133,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.557,
    "sha256": "129e428122cd889010d536181fc3c9eebaeb7c4e2a402b45c2042dd36f911230",
    "simhash": "1:075c3841227d06a1",
    "word_count": 184
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:17:01.495884+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "BORDEN versus NASH\u2019s ADMINISTRATOR de bonis non."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Stone, J.\nThe practice is generally so said down in the books, and the authorities are all that way; but the courts in this country have taken a shorter road\u2014and whenever the defendant does not plead plene administravit, they have always permitted the plaintiff on nulla bona being returned on the execution the bonis testatoris, to levy the debt de bonis propriis, without waiting for the return of a devastavit.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Stone, J."
      },
      {
        "text": "M\u2019Coy, J.\nconcurring,\nThe supersedeas was set aside.",
        "type": "concurrence",
        "author": "M\u2019Coy, J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "At this term Slade and Graham, for the plaintiff,",
      "Martin for the defendant,"
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Newbern,\nSeptember Term, 1796.\nBORDEN versus NASH\u2019s ADMINISTRATOR de bonis non.\nTHE defendant omitted to plead plene administravit, and judgment being obtained, the plaintiff took out an execution de bonis testatores. On nulla bona being returned, he took out an execution de bonis propriis.\nThe defendant prayed and obtained a writ of supersedeas quia erronice emanavit to the last execution. And\nAt this term Slade and Graham, for the plaintiff,\nmoved to have the supersedeas set aside.\nMartin for the defendant,\ncontended that the execution had irregularly issued de bonis propriis, before a devastavit had been returned\u2014and cited 1 Morgan\u2019s Vade Mecum 210, 211."
  },
  "file_name": "0042-01",
  "first_page_order": 50,
  "last_page_order": 50
}