{
  "id": 12126369,
  "name": "DANIEL versus COBB's EXECUTOR",
  "name_abbreviation": "Daniel v. Cobb's Executor",
  "decision_date": "1796-09",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "42",
  "last_page": "43",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "nominative",
      "cite": "1 Mart. 42"
    },
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "1 N.C. 42"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C. Super. Ct.",
    "id": 22358,
    "name": "North Carolina Superior Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 60,
    "char_count": 509,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.598,
    "sha256": "440be62c3e18e14ce1dddf6a58cd5887a3e05db99c5fd6ab4bdafe7d6f6dd0b0",
    "simhash": "1:bd6d41ba5219bd8f",
    "word_count": 82
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:17:01.495884+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "DANIEL versus COBB\u2019s EXECUTOR."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "But the Court,\nM\u2019Coy, J. and Stone, J.\noverruled the plea they said it had been adjudged that this action could be revived.\nA case was cited which the same principle was held, respecting the action of traver, at Wilmington Superior Court.\nHarris for the plaintiff.\nDavie for the defendant,",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "M\u2019Coy, J. and Stone, J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Harris for the plaintiff.",
      "Davie for the defendant,"
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Newbern,\nSeptember Term, 1796.\nDANIEL versus COBB\u2019s EXECUTOR.\nSCIRE facias to revive an action of detinue: Davie, for the defendant, pleaded, in abatement, that this action could not be revived against representatives."
  },
  "file_name": "0042-02",
  "first_page_order": 50,
  "last_page_order": 51
}