{
  "id": 12127929,
  "name": "MOORING versus STANTON",
  "name_abbreviation": "Mooring v. Stanton",
  "decision_date": "1795-09",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "52",
  "last_page": "52",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "nominative",
      "cite": "1 Mart. 52"
    },
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "1 N.C. 52"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C. Super. Ct.",
    "id": 22358,
    "name": "North Carolina Superior Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 53,
    "char_count": 444,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.708,
    "sha256": "324b9af8fa6d453f7ef2a86c442fba0e5096ca0e4bc1b46352d896e3ec7cfb4a",
    "simhash": "1:aa1cd207729fbe2e",
    "word_count": 84
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:17:01.495884+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "MOORING versus STANTON."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Haywood, J.\nMoney lent to play with, or to pay, at the time of loss, is not recoverable. But it is otherwise of a gaming debt paid by a third person, at the request of the loser.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Haywood, J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Newbern,\nSeptember Term, 1795.\nMOORING versus STANTON.\nCase, on a promissory note, the consideration of which appeared to be money paid by the plaintiff to a third person, for money lost at gaming by the defendant.\nOn a plea of the statute of gaming. 1788, 5, 633."
  },
  "file_name": "0052-02",
  "first_page_order": 60,
  "last_page_order": 60
}