{
  "id": 12129984,
  "name": "BIZZEL versus BURKE",
  "name_abbreviation": "Bizzel v. Burke",
  "decision_date": "1796-09",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "61",
  "last_page": "61",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "nominative",
      "cite": "1 Mart. 61"
    },
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "1 N.C. 61"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C. Super. Ct.",
    "id": 22358,
    "name": "North Carolina Superior Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 50,
    "char_count": 385,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.674,
    "sha256": "f6d25742af94b5920f0bd5c111ead43806f22038f9c170fae0a2d66833ef05f5",
    "simhash": "1:0c6384f7e7dc93a8",
    "word_count": 62
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:17:01.495884+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "BIZZEL versus BURKE."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "IN this suit, it was ruled by the Court, M\u2019Coy, J. and Stone, J. that upon the injuction dissolved, and the bill continued as an original, if the complainant neglects to take out depositions or subpoena witnesses, the suit is discontinued, at the second term after the injunction dissolved.\nEx relatione Stanly, Magistri.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Newbern,\nSeptember Term, 1796.\nIn Equity.\nBIZZEL versus BURKE."
  },
  "file_name": "0061-02",
  "first_page_order": 69,
  "last_page_order": 69
}