{
  "id": 12143249,
  "name": "Guliem's case",
  "name_abbreviation": "Guliem's case",
  "decision_date": "1793",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "88",
  "last_page": "88",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "nominative",
      "cite": "1 Mart. 88"
    },
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "1 N.C. 88"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "C.C.D.N.C.",
    "id": 17319,
    "name": "United States Circuit Court for the District of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 65,
    "char_count": 502,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.638,
    "sha256": "3979621b1ad97d2f551dc4a4716f7dcbbb9dbaa2de8a7cb8b6ea35c51a07c84f",
    "simhash": "1:3eb459a6487f750c",
    "word_count": 97
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:17:01.495884+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Guliem\u2019s case."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "NOTA, in this case it was said by Doderidge, J. that if a passenger lodges three days in an inn successively, the hostler is not answerable for his goods, if they be stolen out of his room. By the ancient law a traveller was so called the first day; for it is not known from whence he came: the second day he is called Hogen Hinde, and the third day a menial servant; and a hostler was heretofore, answerable for him as for his menial servant ill the leet. Postea, p. 127.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Guliem\u2019s case.\nPasch. 1 Car."
  },
  "file_name": "0088-01",
  "first_page_order": 256,
  "last_page_order": 256
}