{
  "id": 12145421,
  "name": "Jermyn vs. Randall",
  "name_abbreviation": "Jermyn v. Randall",
  "decision_date": "1793",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "125",
  "last_page": "125",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "nominative",
      "cite": "1 Mart. 124"
    },
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "1 N.C. 124"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "C.C.D.N.C.",
    "id": 17319,
    "name": "United States Circuit Court for the District of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 46,
    "char_count": 334,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.629,
    "sha256": "ae9ef20f2b63556685276b964d7ca654da63c50086a723fb142cc5389185d694",
    "simhash": "1:cff2ff4dc9ee0c4a",
    "word_count": 55
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:17:01.495884+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "*Jermyn vs. Randall."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "THE condition of the obligation was to pay 10s. weekly, secundum ordinem factum per justiciar. &c. for keeping a bastard. The defendant on oyer pleaded nullum talem ordinem fecere. The plaintiff had judgment. It would have been otherwise if it had been secundum ordinem faciendum. Dyer 196. Noy 79.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "*Jermyn vs. Randall.\nPasch. 2 Car."
  },
  "file_name": "0125-01",
  "first_page_order": 285,
  "last_page_order": 285
}