{
  "id": 12146424,
  "name": "Morgan vs. Moor",
  "name_abbreviation": "Morgan v. Moor",
  "decision_date": "1793",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "134",
  "last_page": "134",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "nominative",
      "cite": "1 Mart. 134"
    },
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "1 N.C. 134"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "C.C.D.N.C.",
    "id": 17319,
    "name": "United States Circuit Court for the District of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 102,
    "char_count": 1091,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.565,
    "sha256": "b491772c3a47b0ca60d5223236e8c5f67d848f5d85c8edc57618e37a59d8bd17",
    "simhash": "1:2fa28be75d46ec43",
    "word_count": 205
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:17:01.495884+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Morgan vs. Moor."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Doderidge, J. and Jones, J.\nWe doubt that it may be made part of the record. We think it cannot: But we will take time to think on it.\nJones, J.\nBefore he pleads in nullo est erratum the defendant may alledge the custom and conclude, so, in nullo est erratum.\nDoderidge, J.\nThe custom ought to appear in the record below, and not in the pleadings in error. 2. R. 3. 9. How a man is to take advantage of a custom to affirm his judgment.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Doderidge, J. and Jones, J. Jones, J. Doderidge, J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Crew, pro defendente,"
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Morgan vs. Moor.\nTrin. 2. Car.\nDEBT in Bristol on concessit solvere secundum ordinem civitatis. Judgment given, error assigned in the King\u2019s Bench, that it does not appear what this custom is, it being only said secundum consuetudinem, &c. The defendant in error pleaded in nullo est erratum.\nCrew, pro defendente,\nprayed that he might be allowed to supply the defect, that is by an averment of the custom.\nDoderidge, J. and Jones, J. It ought to be put in the declaration, in Bristol, or may be alledged here before the plea in nullo est erratum. But now it cannot be made part of the record.\nCrew, I will alledge it, and leave the other party to demur."
  },
  "file_name": "0134-01",
  "first_page_order": 294,
  "last_page_order": 294
}