{
  "id": 12146907,
  "name": "Abdee's case",
  "name_abbreviation": "Abdee's case",
  "decision_date": "1793",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "146",
  "last_page": "146",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "nominative",
      "cite": "1 Mart. 146"
    },
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "1 N.C. 146"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "C.C.D.N.C.",
    "id": 17319,
    "name": "United States Circuit Court for the District of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 119,
    "char_count": 1257,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.548,
    "sha256": "7b79e77bbe1cd7a56400dd06844d2155b85372236d02a77566243093df1820b4",
    "simhash": "1:1e4b8f3fc65af011",
    "word_count": 251
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:17:01.495884+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Abdee\u2019s case."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Doderidge, J.\nIf the lessee for twenty one years, grants a\nrent for life, it is good during the term, and it is a chattel.\nCrew, C. J.\nI would not trust it in the court of requests.....\nJones, J.\n.... to sue for the rent, on the supposition that the deed is lost. For it is contrary to a main principle of law. And when the lessee, as here, denies the truth of the fact, they ought not to proceed over.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Doderidge, J. Crew, C. J. Jones, J."
      },
      {
        "text": "Crew, C. J.\nconcurred. It is an encroachment on the court of Chancery, to give remedy when the deed is lost.\nPer totam curiam. A suit may be brought there for the deeds; bur not for the rent or annuity.\nDoderidge, J. I knew a bill thrown out of court brought by the devisee of a rent seck. M. 3 Car. B. A. Miller sued in the Court of Requests, because he had lost his bond: and a prohibition was granted, although it was said at the bar, that the grantee of the rent seck, who had lost his bond, was relieved in Chancery.\nJones, J. There is a great difference between the court of Chancery and that of Requests. C. L. 147.",
        "type": "concurrence",
        "author": "Crew, C. J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Abdee\u2019s case.\nTrin. 2 Car.\nTENANT in fee granted a rent for life, and made a lease for years of the land: the grantee supposing that he had lost the deed, and that it had fallen into the hands of the lessee, sued him for the rent."
  },
  "file_name": "0146-01",
  "first_page_order": 306,
  "last_page_order": 306
}