{
  "id": 12147430,
  "name": "Sharpe vs. Roll",
  "name_abbreviation": "Sharpe v. Roll",
  "decision_date": "1793",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "151",
  "last_page": "152",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "nominative",
      "cite": "1 Mart. 151"
    },
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "1 N.C. 151"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "C.C.D.N.C.",
    "id": 17319,
    "name": "United States Circuit Court for the District of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 63,
    "char_count": 399,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.634,
    "sha256": "981ca83b241653cca77ee723e72d3898c81ecebaedacf0944bdfd944cd98f3d6",
    "simhash": "1:24011c9519db4efa",
    "word_count": 77
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:17:01.495884+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Sharpe vs. Roll."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "ONE promised that in consideration that he would deliver such a thing to the plaintiff\u2019s daughter, he would pay for them.\nCuria. Payment shall be intended to the plaintiff; although it ought to have been averred more plainly in the declaration. Yet it is well enough. 40 E. 3, 20. 4 E. 2. obligat. 16. 2 E. 4. 21. Plea 140. Postea, p. 272. 2 Cr. 77. Poph. 181. Noy 83.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Sharpe vs. Roll.\nTrin. 2 Car."
  },
  "file_name": "0151-03",
  "first_page_order": 311,
  "last_page_order": 312
}