{
  "id": 12147530,
  "name": "Felton vs. Weaver",
  "name_abbreviation": "Felton v. Weaver",
  "decision_date": "1793",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "152",
  "last_page": "153",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "nominative",
      "cite": "1 Mart. 152"
    },
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "1 N.C. 152"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "C.C.D.N.C.",
    "id": 17319,
    "name": "United States Circuit Court for the District of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 130,
    "char_count": 1152,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.623,
    "sha256": "3637b411b3c9c5429f771c586eb5e67871fff2c4e6c2f1bccfaa25bd77eacbb6",
    "simhash": "1:8fb594a394f5f787",
    "word_count": 209
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:17:01.495884+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "*Felton vs. Weaver."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Jones, J.\nThe entry here shall not be, as the party requires, but as awarded by the court. Novel Entry 242, 266. 1 Roll. 764, 765. Jones 139. Noy 83.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Jones, J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "*Felton vs. Weaver.\nTrin. 2 Car.\nIN error, after errors assigned, the defendant pleaded in nullo est erratum. The record not being fully removed, it was agreed that the plaintiff and the defendant are now estopped from alledging a diminution of record, and no certiorari can be awarded at the suit of the parties: But on the view of Bishop\u2019s case, and other precedents, it was agreed per curiam, that the court may award a certiorari, en officio, ad informand. conscientiam; and then what is so certified, shall be annexed to the record, and called a rider.\nBut Whitlock, J. thought differently.\nAnd by the advice of Doderidge, J. the party took such a certiorari ex officio, and the judgment was reversed.\nNovel entry 254, 263, 267. Gage's case, 5 Rep. quod intratur, M. 39, 40 Eliz. and Bishop\u2019s case, 5. Rep. quod rotulat. P. 33 Eliz. rot. 361, which was after a nihil dicit, and not after an in nullo est erratum, as the book says. T. 13 Jac. rot. 52. Bishop of Rochester\u2019s case, and Young\u2019s case."
  },
  "file_name": "0152-02",
  "first_page_order": 312,
  "last_page_order": 313
}