{
  "id": 12150649,
  "name": "Anonymous",
  "name_abbreviation": "Anonymous",
  "decision_date": "1793",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "192",
  "last_page": "192",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "nominative",
      "cite": "1 Mart. 192"
    },
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "1 N.C. 192"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "C.C.D.N.C.",
    "id": 17319,
    "name": "United States Circuit Court for the District of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 73,
    "char_count": 582,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.553,
    "sha256": "f81a8bfc9ce3432f926328beacd0bf41a3359497fc4a01b4c00187b62e9ad010",
    "simhash": "1:9276538134564c64",
    "word_count": 111
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:17:01.495884+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "* Anonymous."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "It was held by\nDoderidge, J. (and Whitlock, J. and Jones, J.\nseemed to incline thereto) that the statute 21 Jac. 1 c. 4. p. 365, does not restrain suits on p\u0153nal statutes, in the King\u2019s Bench, because that court is not named in it.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Doderidge, J. (and Whitlock, J. and Jones, J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "* Anonymous.\nPasch. 2 Car.\nAN action was brought in London, in the sheriff's court there, on the statute 3 and 4 Ed. 6, for buying and selling cattle. The court held it bad; and the party being removed here by habeas corpus, was discharged. The suit being on a p\u0153nal statute, ought to have been in the Court of Sessions of the Justices of the Peace."
  },
  "file_name": "0192-01",
  "first_page_order": 343,
  "last_page_order": 343
}