{
  "id": 12153018,
  "name": "Langly vs. Stoke",
  "name_abbreviation": "Langly v. Stoke",
  "decision_date": "1793",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "261",
  "last_page": "261",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "nominative",
      "cite": "1 Mart. 260"
    },
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "1 N.C. 260"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "C.C.D.N.C.",
    "id": 17319,
    "name": "United States Circuit Court for the District of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 76,
    "char_count": 524,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.585,
    "sha256": "3eb6c6b7c7f6474e974f498fcb75723e0f879852b73e7f7d5dfe6bff782b5113",
    "simhash": "1:93d5bb2581c4d086",
    "word_count": 98
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:17:01.495884+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Langly vs. Stoke."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Doderidge, J.\nagreed to the case put by Davenport, Serj. where a jury were had, at the bar to try the issue in the case of one Drake, and dismissed; because the exception, was taken in time. So 2 E. 4. 33. Godb. 399. Noy 97. Jones 172.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Doderidge, J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Langly vs. Stoke.\nHill. 3 Car.\nTHE plaintiff counted directly in the time of King James, contra pacem domini regis nunc, &c. and, after verdict non allocatur in arrest of judgment, quia matter of form, if the whole had been omitted, it would not have arrested the judgment after verdict."
  },
  "file_name": "0261-01",
  "first_page_order": 384,
  "last_page_order": 384
}