{
  "id": 8649974,
  "name": "W. A. GIBSON v. H. C. BARBER and wife",
  "name_abbreviation": "Gibson v. Barber",
  "decision_date": "1889-02",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "322",
  "last_page": "322",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "103 N.C. 322"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "100 N. C., 192",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8650268
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/100/0192-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 123,
    "char_count": 1202,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.501,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.20758217950158483
    },
    "sha256": "948e11f20ac5e1b8d6bc7ffd1ddbdc99d016049358a2307a7f69781e0016e5d5",
    "simhash": "1:1977b0cf16726f69",
    "word_count": 218
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:40:09.785450+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "W. A. GIBSON v. H. C. BARBER and wife."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Shepherd, J.\nWhen this case was last before the Court (100 N. C., 192), it was held \u201cthat so much of the proceeding as looks to an adjustment of controversies arising out of the administration of the whole trust estate, by the mortgagees, and beyond that which belongs to the land, must be declared to be erroneous, and is reversed.\u201d \u201cThe cause,\u201d says the Court, \u201cwill proceed in the Court below in accordance with the l\u00bfw as declared in this opinion.\u201d It was also held that the plaintiff, by his purchase, took the legal estate, subject to the right of the defendant to redeem, and that the judgment should have directed that, if the indebtedness was not paid by a day certain, the land should be sold.\nWe have examined the judgment of his Plonor, and it seems to be fully sustained by the principles stated in the opinion. No error was pointed out by counsel, and we are unable to find any. The judgment is affirmed.\nNo error. \" Affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Shepherd, J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Mr. C. W. Tillett, for the plaintiff.",
      "No counsel for the defendants."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "W. A. GIBSON v. H. C. BARBER and wife.\n[For syllabus, see same case in 100 N. C., p. 193.]\nCivil actioN, tried before Merrimon, J., at February Term, 1889, of the Superior. Court of RICHMOND.\nMr. C. W. Tillett, for the plaintiff.\nNo counsel for the defendants."
  },
  "file_name": "0322-01",
  "first_page_order": 346,
  "last_page_order": 346
}