{
  "id": 8651717,
  "name": "B. B. LENOIR et al v. THE VALLEY RIVER MINING COMPANY",
  "name_abbreviation": "Lenoir v. Valley River Mining Co.",
  "decision_date": "1889-09",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "490",
  "last_page": "491",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "104 N.C. 490"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 158,
    "char_count": 1915,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.551,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 7.317852702137001e-08,
      "percentile": 0.438904546172383
    },
    "sha256": "4cd40b410bf980492cc3beddb914a6b3a814c4608fbed0d971baee4e6a8f8581",
    "simhash": "1:942d45a7dc14e9c4",
    "word_count": 329
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T17:01:43.175763+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "B. B. LENOIR et al v. THE VALLEY RIVER MINING COMPANY."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Merrimon, C. J.:\nIt is the duty of parties, and important to them, especially in cases of moment, to see that their appeals are prosecuted in this Court industriously, and thoroughly argued. Such arguments are not only valuable helps to the Court, but, in some cases, they are essential to a proper understanding and decision of them. Parties should earnestly endeavor to present their cases before the Court in the most intelligible manner practicable, especially as this is the Court of last resort, settling the law in its-application to cases indefinitely. It is of the highest importance that it shall be settled correctly.\nWe have examined the record in this case with considerable scrutiny. It is voluminous and confused. The assignments of error in several important respects are indefinite and scarcely intelligible, as we see them. We are unable, so far, to interpret them satisfactorily. The elaborate brief of the appellant has reference to only a part of the errors assigned, and the counsel present said little more than read it. The case was not argued at all for the appel-lees. It seems to be of considerable importance and merits to be thoroughly argued. Indeed, we think it due to the parties to direct that it be reargued for the appellants, and argued also for the appellees, at the next term. To that end the case must be continued. The Clerk will give the parties notice of this order.\nIt is so ordered.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Merrimon, C. J.:"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "No counsel for the plaintiffs.",
      "Mr. J. W. Cooper (Mr. Edward McCardy was on the brief with him), for the defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "B. B. LENOIR et al v. THE VALLEY RIVER MINING COMPANY.\nAppeal \u2014 Argument.\nIt is the duty of parties to see that their causes are fully argued in the Supreme Court, and where this has not been \u2014 especially where the record is voluminous and assignments of error indefinite \u2014 the Court will require it to be reargued.\nAppeal from Pall Term, 1888, of Cherokee Superior Court.\nNo counsel for the plaintiffs.\nMr. J. W. Cooper (Mr. Edward McCardy was on the brief with him), for the defendant."
  },
  "file_name": "0490-01",
  "first_page_order": 522,
  "last_page_order": 523
}